97: Flowers for Fuller

Mo Facts with Adam Curry for March 20th, 2024. This is episode number 97. Only three more episodes to go in this series of Mo Facts with Adam Curry and I am Adam Curry coming to you from the heart of the Texas Hill Country. Time once again to spin the wheel of topics from here to Northern Virginia. Ladies and gentlemen, please say hello to my friend on the other end, the one and only Mr. Mo Facts. How you doing, Adam? Mo, I am good. It's good to hear your voice, brother. Same to hear your voice as well. Well, I hear it frequently, but directly it's good to hear it. Yeah, and I mean your rig has just, you know, it's taken four years, but finally we got a rig, you got a connection, and just as we're about to end the series everything sounds great. Isn't that amazing? Well, I'm about to take it to another level. That's what that is. Hey, everything good with the fam and with Rocco?

Everybody's doing good. Everybody's wonderful. Okay, excellent. How about the family your way? Everything's good, man. The kids are hanging in. Some of them still partially on the payroll. You know who that is. But we're sitting pretty here in the Hill Country. Funny you say that. My son is on my payroll now and he doesn't miss a day of work. Oh, but he's on the real payroll. He's actually working for you. Oh yeah. Yeah, see I don't have that luxury anymore. It's like, what's the cell phone bill? Oh, okay. Tell you what brother, I'm going to spin the wheel of clips if you don't mind. A wheel of topics I should say. Round and round it goes. Let's see what we're going to talk about today.

Mofax with Adam Curry where that wheel stops nobody knows Mofax knows because he has selected this whole show for us. Let's see today's topic is... Take control in a way that people think, speak and act. Oh yes, that's kind of up my alley I'd say. Yeah that's Mr. Nilly Fuller. We're gonna get into some To address this confusion that's running rampant right now, we've done it before, but I think we need to have a booster. A booster shot, yeah! We need to have a booster of addressing the confusion that's running wild. Throughout our culture, throughout the social media, throughout the media, throughout politics, everything. It seems like we had a law there

And it's just spike right back up. It might be due to the election, you know, this less than a year away. It could be due to this, the ramping up of just race. Yeah, I mean, we were almost going over four years. We started having this conversation and race was, you know, it was Yeah, it was four years. Yeah. No, no, wait. It's been almost five because we started as I was coming back from my honeymoon. So I'd only been married for a month or so. And that's when we started. We didn't start recording the show, but that's when we started talking. Right. And that's the thing is that we it was just percolating and we've ran this whole cycle to the point that we're at peak racism right now, our peak

Race focus and I knew this was going to be the main What's the world looking for a manipulator well nice it's more important now than ever you know now that it appears that 45 future 47 seems to have black America on his hand Or at least a portion of it black men, maybe And that seems to be a big threat Yes, and then all everything that's going on with it. It's a lot going on. So let's just go ahead We're gonna find out we're gonna talk about it. We're gonna get there. I promise you we're gonna talk about it. So Also, this is me giving my flowers to mr. Nilly full of junior while he can still smell them Yeah, I would like to say one thing that um, I

Having his work and actually digging into it across these five years, deeper than I have ever had, has prepared me for what's going on. So I want to give him his flowers while he can smell them. And we're going to start off with the first clip. And it's that they control our minds. Well, they have all kinds of ways because they control the way that people think, speak, and act if they are people of color. And we have to have a new way of thinking, speaking and acting. That's why I call it the compensatory code, what I've written. That's the way out of this. We have to change the way that we see what we're looking at. Because we are told that we are looking at something that's different from what the way it really is. What we're really looking at is white supremacy all around us. Even when you don't see any white people at all, you are looking at a world that they have produced.

and a way of thinking that they have produced, and a way of acting that they have produced. And when people are in conflict with each other, they have produced that, even when they are nowhere around. They are the ones who directly or indirectly produce the circumstances that will bring on the conflict. You have to understand that they are masters of the activities of The non-white people, the people that they classify as non-white on this planet. This is probably one of the most misunderstood things, not just of Neely Fuller Jr., but also of this podcast, is the term white supremacy. I like that he used the compensatory code in there. I thought that was interesting. But this is something that people get stuck on. Because they get stuck on the word white. White, yes, exactly.

Not the system not supremacy White I heard you and right but as the operating system Yes, and we're gonna get we're gonna we have to go we have to double back for exactly reason you said because It's like I said, it needs a booster. And it's confusing because the left has hijacked this term and used it as a weapon to hit the right over the head with it. Now it's become partisan with the whole woke thing and that whole phenomenon that it doesn't mean what they say it means. We're talking about a system of control that's based off of skin color.

That's what it is now if you snap that'll snap I tell people all the time if you've been oh snapped your fingers and got rid of white people there will be a power vacuum if somebody else was sliding to that power vacuum right what the reason why I'm so Focused on this is not because I'm high and I said it's on the last show not because I'm hung up on white supremacy I'm hung up on actually achieving justice and justice is by the definition in the book that The people that need the most help get the most constructive help and no one is mistreated. Who can be against that? Nobody. It's that simple. And whatever it is in the way of that, it is what it is. And that's where the term, it starts with us, came from. It starts with us. It's not going to end with us. And in this episode, I'm going to lay out how I think it's going to play out. But before I do, if you want a better understanding,

of what, because I don't go into detail of when it started or how I think it started because that's not the point. I'm trying to figure out what this operating system is running right now, but the Hidden Life is Best podcast is a great source. And he said I was his inspiration. But I've listened to his, I've been listening to his work and he goes back into just where he thinks the beginning of this control system. I don't think he used the term white supremacy, but that would be a good, if you want to know who or who might it be, I'm not concerned with that. I'm concerned with, like you said, the operating system.

So how it functions or how it spreads, we have to go back to episode 92. This is a throwback clip in the episode White Lies and this is Learn to Command the Spells and this is Laurel Erica. In all our efforts to heal our psyche and raise consciousness on the planet, we have all but overlooked the very instrument of conscious thought and communication. Yet our forked tongue English language, which is the leading software of the Western mind, is itself in great need of retuning and upgrading.

Over the course of my life, I cultivated a heightened sensitivity to how the total normality of insanity in society is echoed, reflected, and reinforced by the English language. which inadvertently yet unavoidably propagates an antiquated and manipulated vision of reality promulgated by the ancient church as an instrument of mind control at a time when people had to surrender their mind if they wanted to keep their heads about them, quite literally. The Forked Tongue

Wow, it's the software. That's really good. It's the language. Of course. The way we speak to each other, the way we interact. You can say one thing, and this is why text is terrible, to communicate because without the component of context, there's no context in text. And the way you inferred it, because like when we're speaking to each other, you can listen to the tone of my voice, the way I said it, how I said it. But when it's flat text, there's none of this there. So you can throw in the sarcasm, throw an emoji.

Right you can miss the sarcasm you can miss the timing everything and that I've seen relationships go left Language, you know and I see this all the time with people They'll read a text to me and then I'll sit there and said you just read that in the tone that you Received it the way you think that person sent it, but that's on you. That's that's your receiver and That may not be, let me read it to you in a different way. And I can read that same text in a positive tone and people go, oh, yeah, I guess, yeah, that's kind of, yeah, didn't think about that. And that's why this four year journey has been so important because people have been able to sit on the sidelines and see people put their emotions to the side and have an honest conversation

I don't have, I'm a political atheist. I don't believe in any of it. You're no agenda. You don't understand. We both came into this conversation and saying we want to seek first to understand then to be understood. Amen. Which that's one of the seven habits of highly effective people. All of this goes together. All of it goes together and this is why we've been ineffective because people want to be understood first, want to be the first to talk. No, no, no, hear me out. Stop you missing. No, no, no, hear me out. That kind of thing. You should be quick to listen, slow to speak, even slower to get angry. Correct. And what would you get angry about? Because once again, Nellie Fuller says the only respect there is is self-respect.

The only way you can disrespect yourself is to lie to yourself So even if you say something that I don't agree with if I accept it And I don't let you know I agree with it then I lie to myself, but if I say Adam You know I don't agree with that. I'm not gonna try to change your mind I'm not gonna. I'm not gonna feel disrespected right, but the fact that I aired it and it goes vice versa You can say oh no no if I agree with that You're not disrespecting yourself and nobody's walking away from the situation feeling disrespected Exactly. The other thing of course is the meaning of words is being changed continuously Real-time. Yeah in the dictionary, in the dictionaries even. Well, I don't know if you saw this or not But I don't want to go off on a tangent, but I have to say this in a quick minute

Candace Owens sat down with this rabbi, I don't remember his name, and he explained what anti-Semitism was. And he actually says, it's a mutating definition. How can the definition of a word be ever-changing? Yeah, uh, oh, schmoley schmoley, Botich. No, that's not she didn't sit down with schmoley that they've been having their own war, but they actually, but that's how he explained it. And I was like, well, you're never getting anywhere with that because

the person you're being accused of will never know what they're being accused of. Right, yeah, because we don't have the same understanding of the term. Right, and we've seen it with recession, we've seen it with women, we've seen it with... When it gets to something basic like men and women and the definition and even our Supreme Court justices can't define it, you know we're in trouble. We're in big trouble or we're right where? Quote-unquote they want us to be want us to be that's right, and that's Ness on sand You never can have a strong house can't have a strong house built on sand there it is So I dug into what she said a little deeper, and this is from memento is a YouTube channel momento Mori and this is a speak like magic and

Conscious language is not just a contemporary idea, but a practice deeply embedded in history, resonating with beliefs held by ancient civilizations about the power of words. Ancient cultures, such as the Egyptians and Greeks, revered words for their creative and transformative abilities. They believed that words could bring intentions to life and influence thoughts, emotions, and outcomes. This reverence underscores the enduring recognition of words as potent tools that resonate with specific energies and have the power to shape our existence.

Today we can draw upon these time-honored insights, integrating them with modern approaches like Neurolinguistics Programming, NLP, which employs language to rewire the mind and shift perspectives. However, wielding this power responsibly demands ethical mindfulness. We must be considerate of how our words impact others, aiming to uplift rather than harm, and always respecting individual autonomy and consent. Yeah. Mind wars comes through words all the time. Information war. I'm always jealous of AJ. I always liked Infowars.com. I always wanted that one. Information is put through what? Images and words.

Which they say an image is worth a thousand words. We're back to words again. Words matter, change your words, change your world. There's another one that's a positive bent on it. And I think a lot of people have been given this information like an NLP layman's and they're going around manipulating other individuals. That's why we're seeing cults on the rise again. It's just we're in a crazy time and I wanted to make this show, I say it again, as a booster shot to say, hey, don't get sucked into the vacuum of confusion. Don't give, you know, have this, even the Bible, it said don't have a spirit of offense, right?

So what does that mean? Don't be offended. The only thing that can offend you, the only thing that can disrespect you is yourself. That's right. I gave up the right to be offended. That happened to me about a year ago. I was like, oh, I don't need to be offended by all this stuff. And when you do, you actually become liberated, which that's what I want for people because that is a sign of justice because that's getting the people that need the most help, the most constructive help. I hope people see where I'm going with this and that's why I say this is an obligation. I can't stop doing whatever I'm doing. I don't know what it is. I don't even know from... I never went into a show like, oh, I have a narrative I want to

Spin and let me go find the supporting information. I go into it with a scientific approach of Where does it leave me? Where is where is this investigation or this? Curiosity leave me which is exactly why it takes six weeks between each show. Yeah It's true. It's true and once I get the information then I have to parse it because I'm like hey I Is this person speaking have a motive? Right. You know, because I don't want to secondhand manipulate somebody by using manipulative information or if I use information that may be manipulative, let me get something to counter that where they can get both sides of the argument. Right.

So yeah, that is part of it. And then I'm a human being myself, so I had to process it all myself to see how I feel about it before I come here and speak on it. I was just watching a video about bias and there's overwhelming scientific proof, scientific proof is the right word, Well, the evidence, maybe that's better. Scientific evidence that the more intelligent you are, the more you are prone to bias. I know exactly where you I know exactly where you saw it because I saw the same video. Is that the after school video? Exactly. Yeah. I'll put it in the show. Yeah. Yeah. It almost made the clips. But I mean, because I you know, but I always be I'm always respectful of the time aspect of it. But you're right.

Yeah, and with the bias, it's a whole thing that you believe because you want to believe going into it. So, but yeah, that would be please add that in the clips. Yeah, I'm going to put that in the show notes. Yeah. I knew it when you, exactly when you said that. So I know we saw that our algorithms are starting to sync up a little bit. Yeah, I did. I probably got it off of your timeline somehow. Who knows? Who knows what happened? No, I didn't post it. Oh, okay. It's interesting. Yeah, our timelines are merging. That's an interesting phenomenon in itself. But where we stop at, we stopped at four. All right, now this is Nealey Fuller. I just want to set it up a little bit. And this is, I have to give a trigger warning because people might be triggered by what is said, but this is Nealey Fuller being honest with himself and

Honest with other people this is nearly full of white folks preaching morality one Like one white man said this in the book statement says God made white people to serve God and made black people to serve white people and that's the way it is and that's the way it should be and if everybody just leave it alone it'll work out now on the surface that sounds reasonable. Sounds logical if you go by looking around you. But then you say now, well then why do they lie so much and prevent you from doing stuff? See because if you are training a dog, the dog is a dog. Okay?

The dog cannot do what a dog is not designed to do. People try to make a dog act like it's a person, but a dog is not a person. So it doesn't make any difference how that dog tries to do what people do, has the mind that a person has. The dog is still a dog. The dog can't do it. The white supremacists tell us that we can't do stuff. But then when we start showing some signs of doing it, they jump in your way. That's what gives them away. Yes. If this was my side role by the creator, it would be no need to manipulate. Just like with you and Phoebe and me in Morocco. That's right. There's no struggle. There's no power struggle between the owner and the dog.

The dog falls into his position and the owner falls into his position. But the fact they have to constantly manipulate, and when I say they, I'm talking about the white supremacists, not all white people because there's three groups of people. I have to clarify this many, many times. There's white supremacists, there's white people, and there's non-white people in the system of white supremacy. It's a choice to be a white supremacist. And I also say, if you choose not to, you're their biggest problem if you're a white person. Because you have the means. Yeah, that's even more dangerous to be white and not choose to be in the system is actually perilous. I'll give you an example. And I always say we don't want to have a captive audience when we talk about biblical topics. But

For instance, Moses. Once Moses realized what was going on, he was the biggest problem. Yeah. Because he said, I don't want to take part in this. I know I was raised here, but I don't want to take part in this system. that you got going on here." And he became the biggest headache for Pharaoh. And that's how it is for white people that don't want to take part in the system because it's like, it's kind of like when you want to quit a gang. It's like, oh, you want to quit our gang, huh? You know, you know, you could be a real problem. You've been living in this neighborhood seeing what's going on. Yeah. You know, you can go to the police and you know, too much. You know too much.

You know too much. So I just want to make that point. Anything you want to say before we go on to six? No, no, that's good. You said it. Number six. Because see, I took them seriously. You know, I thought about that statement when I first read it. I said, you know what, that could be true. And then we'll make a whole lot of about nothing. What we need to do is just shut up and do what these white folks tell us to do. I said, that could be true. But then I started thinking, that couldn't be true. Because if that was true, Regardless of what they did to try to get us to do anything that we were designed not to do. We couldn't do it. Okay? So they lied. And not only that, another bigger thing that gives them away, if they're doing God's will, they mistreat people. They mistreat their own people. So hey, that don't add up. Right. So if I understand what he's saying there, he's saying

that racism isn't really just about skin color, it's just about a position of power. Based off of skin color. And we're going to get, the reason why I'm saying based off of skin color is we have to go back to what the skin color factor is. Quote unquote white people, actually let's start here, race is a construct. Right. To even go off of color is stupid in itself because you have people that in my family that may be lighter than the darkest person in your family. If you start looking at it, but it's like no, you've been designated as this and you've been designated as that. So to go off of that is dumb, but that's what it's based off of. Because yes,

The reason why it's based off of that is because white people are the minority of the world. And they, and white supremacists have conjured up this spell to say, hey, we got to close our ranks. If we don't, we'll be bred out. I was thinking about this the other day, you know, if you read in the Bible, there's a lot of reference to master and slave, which there it is. There's a word that I think has been, the meaning has changed throughout time, throughout millennia.

And if we know that there were white slaves and black people, so-called black people who had so-called white people as slaves, and slavery was quite a thing. But we really got hyper-focused on Kunta Kinte. Yes. By, I would say, the white supremacists who want to always make sure we have that in mind and not anything else. It has to be front of mind. Yeah, and it's in this based off of fear. It's based off of fit It's literally based off of fear which it from my understanding and it's not and the thing I like about Neil he doesn't get into the why That's more when you get to Francis curse Wilson of the why it is and like I don't care what the why is to be honest with you, but I

It has to be somewhat discussed just to say, oh, okay, I never thought about it that way. Because I experienced this. This is where I can put my, literally put myself in the shoes of quote unquote white people. Because when we start talking about ADOS, like hey, they're trying to breed us out. They're bringing in other people that look like us, they're not us. And they're trying to replace us. Kamala Harris. Yeah, so I understand the great replacement because it's going on in a micro sense in America with the ADOS slash FBA people because if it keeps it up this way, if with Planned Parenthood, what they're doing with interracial dating. And by the way, and by the way, note, I'm sorry to interrupt. Notice our vice president Kamala Harris, not black American, not ADOS. Let me put it that way.

Where does she go on her big campaign trail? Planned Parenthood. Yeah. That's her first stop. I'm looking at that like, wow, you're really laying it on thick. Hey, this is where we exterminate y'all. This is where we're keeping your population in check. Correct, but at the same time that's where the confusion comes in. They can't because a person from the outside looking in like they can't be getting rid of black people. They're trying to bring more here or brown people, just say non-white people. Right. Because you're bringing in the millions. What sense does that make? Right. And I'm looking at like, hey, my lineage is being

Yeah, uh, why? Why? Why, Mo? Why? Why? Why does the system of white supremacy do that? Because we have the biggest claim. If you want to know what I think we have the biggest claim in these reparations And that's why reparations is such it is such a hot topic when you bring it up cuz like hey We were mistreated. We want to be compensated. They're not all you want to be compensated. All right Here's some Planned Parenthood. Are you want to be compensated some more? It's a fit and all oh you want to be compensated some more okay, we're gonna and this is it's it's funny because it's a

It's true. It's true. What happened to the Moe who, I don't know if this is your personal opinion, but I always liked that you said you wanted atonement. Correct, I'm just saying but I'm using the word they did the trigger. Okay. Yeah now see when I say atonement you see how it changes now going back to words when we say atonement Okay, I can understand that but when you say reparations, oh all hell breaks. That's right You could just type reparations on social me just that one word and you're gonna get all kind of engagement yeah, but I'm just saying that is the real and that's why I had to I

And it's not just with reparations, I had to use another term. 45 savage, I had to use another term. Because when you say Trump, that word is such a trigger for people. You can't even have the conversation. So we have to If you want to have an effective conversation, you have to realize that this might be triggering to somebody. Let me use the term atonement, and I use the word atonement purposely because it's up to the person that owes me to want to pay me. You know, the reason why I discuss it is because that keeps both political parties from messing with me. Like, hey, I want atonement. And they're like, what atonement? It's kind of like reparation, but you want to do it. They're like, well, nice talking to you, Mo. Nice talking to you. Yeah, that's not going to happen. Right. And that's a bipartisan thing. Both sides is like, no, we can't give you anything because that breaks the whole system of white supremacy.

You want to be made equal? What? At least economically equal? Why don't we say made whole? That sounds more like the term that it is. Correct. I'm just saying, but it would lift us up off the bottom at least a little bit. And it's like, you're not on the bottom by mistake. That's by design and they've convinced other people to come here. Hey, you know those people that's already here with colored skin? They're on the bottom so you don't have to worry about being on the bottom. And that's why they come here with the audacity that they do. Well, man, it's starting to backfire because I keep looking at Chicago. I think it's ground zero of this because Chicago, you know, the whole alder, the whole ward system and they've got, you know, they're organized and they're mad.

And they are not having it. And there's stuff brewing that I'm seeing all kinds, I think we're going to see riots in Chicago. Well, and in TD Hip Hop, it's not TD Hip Hop anymore, but TD Media, he did a story on this, that they're actually letting illegals, and that's another term that you can use, that when you use it, it can be triggering. It's newcomers now, Moe. It's newcomers, new arrivals. Right. But they're allowing them to have guns now. Why not? It's good. It's America. Welcome to America. Right. But that's the thing. It's like, what are we, where are we headed? What are we doing here? And it's all, we're going to get there. I don't want to put too much out front. But where do we stop at? I think we stopped at six. Yeah, we're now at seven. Now we're at seven. Okay.

So you brought up a point. So what is the role of black people in America? Well, in the operating system, you could be one of three things. They all start with T and the first one being tacky. The system of white supremacy degenerates people of color. That's what it's designed to do and have them always, always in the modern days. They crafted it very well in such a way that the behavior of many people of color, most will come under one of three categories. Tacky at very best, doesn't get any better than tacky. It's tacky, tacky, tacky. Just any interaction you see between people of color is tacky at very best.

and their interaction of black people with white people. Tacky. Tacky all day long. It's tacky at very best. It doesn't get any better than tacky. Ever. Ever. Under any circumstance, in any area of activity. Tacky definition. Not having or exhibiting good taste. Marked by lack of style. And, oh, here's my favorite, characterized by lack of good breeding. This is Merriam-Webster. So that's the woke dictionary. But that, and that's tacky at best. That's the best you can be in this system of white supremacy. And the case in point is that if you're anything other than that, you're called acting white.

Let that sink in. If you show any, is there any signs of not being one of those three things, you're quick to be called acting white. By black? By everybody. Just think about it. If you say, okay, remember they said straight black men are the white people or black people. Oh there you go at that heterosexual stuff, huh? You sound like a white man. You wanna be self-sufficient? Sounds white to me. You wanna use correct English? Sounds like you're talking white to me. You know what amazes me is that we now have made a distinction

just kind of in the vein of they're coming for you first. White Christian nationalists. Very different from black Christian nationalists. And the white Christian nationalists, they're the terrorists. It's amazing how this stuff is used. And you know why they came up with that term? From my point of view? To distinguish between the evangelical We don't want to cast a wide net. We don't want to cast a wide net now, because some of the evangelicals might not be orange. And this is where skin color comes in. That's where the real problem is. And notice they latched onto that with Trump. His orange skin, his orange, orange, orange, orange, orange, orange, orange. That's a person of color. You're no longer white.

You're orange. And I said this before. I'm sorry, someone just yelled at me. Yeah. Orange man bad. That's right. So you want it? You don't want to go out alone with the system and the system being a the system says, hey, you know what? We got 478 genders now. Oh, you only want to have two. Oh, you know, you're not congruent with the system, right? You're not compliant with the system. You didn't get the firmware update. And that's like the number one place we need to push back is right there. Yeah, or global warming. That's the worst. That's the scariest one. That's the one that's creeping up on us. Yeah. All of this is, it comes in a package. If you don't accept this package, this new firmware update of what a white supremacist is, then you're not white no more. And you know who's getting it the most?

The Jewish person. Podcasters? No, the Jewish person. Yes. You're right. Yeah, big time. Big time. And all of a sudden, that flipped on a dime, didn't it? That went fast. It flipped on a dime and it also made the far-left allies with the far-right racist anti-Semitic. It's amazing how that happened. I mean, what great programming that was. They took the BLM drones and flipped them on a dime and turned them into Jew haters. It was great. It's amazing to see. Now tell me that's, you could say maybe that's naturally occurring? No, no, no, no way. I mean, they literally took the same

the same template. I saw it. It's the same people who are out there for Black Lives Matter, the very same people. You give them the Marxist system of oppressor oppressed and you say these are the oppressed, this is the oppressor, oppressor bad. Here's your sign. Yes. And if you ask these people point to the map, show me Israel on the map, show me Gaza on the map, what does it mean from the river to the sea? I don't know. There's lots of those interviews. I don't really know, but Israel bad.

It's in the firmware. What do you mean? I just, I signed a EULA. I don't know what I signed. I just said, yeah. It's in the EULA. Exactly. It's in the EULA. And that goes back to the video that we didn't play, but we talked about, about the smart people. It's in the, it's in the firmware. You go off to these universities, you have, what? You don't want to, you don't want to be pro-Palestine? You got a problem. Yeah. Something wrong with you. You need reprogramming. And they pushed the far left and far right races together in the same corner. Like, yeah, all y'all anti-Semitic. Mm hmm. Amazing. Very. That happened in, I want to say a span of a month. Just like that. That was amazing how fast that went. I mean, that that shows you how many people just programmed. Now, that to me always says opportunity.

Because if you could if you know the API if you can tap into that firmware you can change it there you go If you understand the methods, yes, what was that? What's the term for intelligent the methods and some what was something in methods? But anyway is if you understand the methods and the method is language and This is not going to be warm. I mean, that's literally a computer programming term. You use a method and that method can execute that on the API and the API then triggers a function. I mean, this is it's literal computer programming stuff, which is language, by the way. It's language. Hello?

Manipulating a computer is language. You can look at computer code and you can say, yeah, I see what it's telling me. Something is going to execute this and this function on this method with this method on this function to get that action. I mean, it's it's must be exactly the same for the human brain. The syntax you have to have the proper syntax. There you go. Syntax and the syntax is memes headlines. Yeah, yeah. Memes. Memes is big. words and the The Well, I want to put it when you see a thousand a million people view this tweet Yeah, and two thousand people like this. I owe it gives it instant validity. That's triggers Where did that come from? How did he who was the first million? Who's the first thousands? Oh

I've never been part of, and anybody can let me know this or not, I've never been part of a viral post. No, bots. It's bots. And I've never trust. I remember, you remember Kony 2012? What was it? 2012? Kony 2012? Yep. K-O-N-Y for those who don't remember. This video went viral overnight with like a hundred million views. Like, no. It was just no. It was bullcrap. Everybody who looked at it went, no, there's no way that got a hundred million views in one night. Because it wasn't. So, I mean, just because something says this many views doesn't mean it's real. It's just a number.

That's the best part of it, is it's just a number. You don't even know what that means. Right, that's the point I was making. I've never been on the upswing of a viral, like one of the first people that got in on it before it got viral. I've never, as long as I've been on the internet, on social media, I've never been one of the first people to like something. When it comes before me, it already has a million views. And it already has, you know, a thousand, two thousand likes and, you know, several hundred comments. We don't need to ask, we need to ask ourselves, how do things become viral? And so in this sea of everybody commenting, making posts, how does

All of these people get something in front of them at the same time. In a short period of time. That's what's going on behind the scenes my brother. Right. So let's just breathe through these next two because I just want to get to the second T and the third T and this is number eight. Then the second. is trashy. If you try to improve on tackiness, if you notice, if you pay strict attention, anytime there's interaction between black people with each other or with black people with white people, if you try to improve on the tackiness, it gets trashy. Everybody starts laughing, first of all, phony laugh. It's all phony and trying to act like everything is okay when it's not.

And that becomes trashy and then it spills over if they try to improve on that within the tacky, of the trashy category. If they try to improve on the trashiness, it just becomes more trashy. And the behavior, sexual and otherwise, becomes just trashier and trashier and trashier. That's black people with each other or black people with white people. Trashy definition being resembling or containing trash or of inferior quality and my favorite indecent. And what's the anonymous inferior superior? Yes. Supreme. There you go.

And this is not exclusive to black people. This is all non-white people. Like when you think about Indian, you think about something silly or the representation in like television shows, you know, it's a certain, or Asian people, it's a certain way they're represented or whoever, whoever they are, they're represented. Even if you say with gay people, They, there's represented a certain way. Yes. Flamboyant. Yeah. You don't see anything with two serious gay men, you know, having a normal life, how it was sold to us. They just want to get married. They're normal people too. But on modern family, how's it sold? Yeah, exactly. Flamboyant drama, tacky, tacky or trashy.

Yes. Yes. And if you want to improve on that, ay ay. And then if you try to improve on the trashiness, then it will spill over into something terroristic. The three T's I call it. And it's in the textbook for victims of racism. Tacky, trashy, terroristic. And it doesn't get any better than tacky. I don't care what scenario is, I don't care how you start out, I don't care what your intentions are. And why is this? It's because the system of white supremacy is set up for it not to be anything outside of those three categories. Tacky, trashy, terroristic. And there's going to be a continuation of that in one form or another.

regardless of what is going on in a political field, anything like that, that's all surface anyway. Terroristic definition. Involving or employing violent acts of terror marked by terrorism, tactics, terroristic organizations or regimes, terroristic. Wow, I didn't expect that one. And that's the confines. And if you step out of those confines, you're no longer, you're no longer, you're no longer non-white. You ain't black. You're no longer non-white because even, even like I said, wherever you go around the world, not exclusive to us, we're just the, now we got to go back to the hip hop and hip in the hop. We just have a special way of doing things.

So we're the tackiest of the tacky. Whenever you give us something, we can make it tacky. And then it just goes from there. Somebody shows up with something, people get to laughing, get to joking, then it becomes a trashy, and then it just devolves from there. And that's normal. Why is it normal? Because society lets it be normal. They promote it to be normal. And I'm gonna get into that later. Right, this is why we can see what Nicki Minaj does on stage or any...

Any hip-hop star. It goes almost, it almost always goes to terroristic even. That's amazing. Right. And if you look at the distance since you brought up Nicki Minaj, say Beyonce for instance. Beyonce and Taylor Swift are components of each other. You know, they're equals. Equivalents as far as star power. But look how they're presented to the world. And one's a single woman and one's a married woman. If you thought who would dress like what? And who would act like what? And who would carry themselves like what? You would say, oh, the married one. Let's take color out of it. The married woman would carry herself this way and the single woman would carry herself this way. But no, you had to be tacky, trashy. Yeah. And somebody's probably gonna get terroristic with me for saying, for pointing this out.

Good. It has to be how the beehive characterize. Yeah, they're coming for you. Terroristic. Yeah. Now, where do we learn that from? Now we got to go back to 91. And this is for Scott free. That's the episode we talked about Scott Adams. He says stay away. Right. But the quote unquote black culture is not black culture. Number nine, black rednecks. Who are they? These would be blacks who came out of the southern culture and who carried that culture with them north into the urban ghettos and into the ghettos of the south for that matter.

and who have not moved out of that culture since. Over the years, both blacks and whites have moved away from that culture. But in the poorest and worst of the ghetto areas, there are lots of people who have not. And these kinds of, it's a culture which didn't do whites any good, and it's certainly not doing blacks any good today. And the tragedy is that people regard this culture as somehow the authentic black culture, and therefore you're not to interfere with it. It's to be allowed, and so they're cheering people on It reminds me of a scene in the Blue Max where this general is encouraging this daredevil pilot to do all kinds of wild stunts, you see, knowing that the guy's going to kill himself if he keeps doing this and therefore the general will be rid of a political problem. Now, I don't think that the white liberals are doing this deliberately, but I think the net result is the same. They are cheering blacks on and doing things that are absolutely self-destructive. What's the difference between a black redneck and a white redneck? Color. Wow, yeah, color.

That's right. And the only issue I have with Thomas Soel, Mr. Soel, is the fact that he says they're not doing it intentionally. Yeah, I hear you. Once again, he has to stay in his lane because he exists in an environment, in an ecosystem that has both left and right. And he doesn't want to get canceled Because he could offend one person and he shows up to his favorite restaurant like, oh sorry Tom, we don't have your table. What table do you have? None. It just goes just like that. I mean that's what, but then he's not a free man. Very few free people in this world. It's very, it could because if you're

in the, you call it the milieu or in the sphere or whatever word you want to use, you know, okay, my operating system has to be this. If I'm a Democrat, same way we just say Charlemagne to God, he does all that talking at the end of the day and I even put a post up there. I said, what's the over under he going to say threatened democracy? It was nine times he said it in an hour. That's the signal. Yes, I understand because he doesn't want to be the white man of black people. Right. Because he has a lot to lose. We're podcasters. We got nothing to lose. Oh, he got his freedom to lose. They got a big old piano hanging over his head. And that's the thing. And that's the thing. They don't let you in the club.

And this is not exclusive to black people because when you look at skull and bones, when you land that casket, they want to know all your secrets. Why? So they have it on you. Yeah. Like I was saying about the gang. Now you can't quit the gang. Right. All right. So I'm going to skip over 10 because it's a bit redundant. And now this is going to be a first. I went to ChatGPT. Oh no! Yeah? We've lost Moe, everybody. No, no, no, no, no, no. ChatGPT is a wonderful resource because it's the mind of the master. If you want to know how white supremacists think, ask ChatGPT. Because it's been programmed. It's literally what? A large language model. Yes. Yes. Let that sink in. A large

Language model. It's the mind of the master. Oh, I like this Yeah, I like it and think about it is this I think it was really created because what language is it programmed on? English We don't we don't say we don't need mathematics anymore. So it's fed with ink. It's fed with English Mm-hmm. I would assume that's how it communicates back to me. I Well, they're making them in multiple languages. But yeah, the prevailing one right now is, of course, English. Which will lag. All the other languages will lag. English. Because I think they said, hey, our kids don't want to learn programming. Our kids don't want to learn math. We'll create something. In fact, this is well known, if you give ChadGBT a math problem,

You know, relatively simple one. Here's one you can try at home, kids. You say, if I have four sweaters hanging on the line to dry and it takes half an hour and I add two more, how long will it take the sweaters to dry? It will try and divide that and say it'll take longer even though it's the same amount because the sweaters all dry at the same time. Large language models do not do math. I'm sure if you wrote that prompt correctly, and this is where you give the person upper hand, understands and masters English. Yeah, the prompt jockeys. Yeah. Yeah. If you can actually master English, which is what we said, the operating system. Yeah. Then you can communicate with it. Long story short, what I did was I said, hey, chat GPT, if I want to confuse people,

If I want to control people by confusion, how would I go about doing that? And this is the response I got back. Controlling someone through confusion is a form of manipulation that involves deliberately creating a state of confusion in an individual to make them more susceptible to influence or control. This technique can undermine an individual's ability to think clearly, make decisions and assert their autonomy. It's important to approach this topic with an understanding that using confusion to control or manipulate others is unethical and can be harmful. The discussion here is for informational purposes and to increase awareness of manipulative tactics so that they can be recognized and countered.

Not to encourage their use. Don't do this at home kids. Yeah, no, but spot on. Yeah. Here's how you create a bomb. Don't do this at home. Right. Well, because it knows how to do this because it's been fed these actual instructions, which is part of the white supremist English language. Is that your answer? Yeah, but fed by who? A white dude named Sam Altman. And it's not just him. I never make it about the individual. No, it's Satya Nadella from Microsoft. Indian. Fed by who? That's the thing. Like, who taught this? As far as I know, they're just scraping up stuff. It's a rhetorical question, but I'm just saying, like, why is it even...

And that's why I say it's the mind of the master. If we, you were saying the tech, we want to know the method. Oh, just ask you. And if we know how the, this is once again, why is the obsession? If I know the roadblock is this system and I'm trying to bring about justice. Okay. Now, now we have a target. Now we've tried like a triangulated, a target that we can go after. We can take this and spin it on its head. I asked again to list some methods. It's going to list out five, what, one, two, three, four methods of how you do it and each one we can go back over them. But now this is the methods of how you would confuse people. Number one, gaslighting. Making someone question their reality, memory or perceptions by denying facts, the environment around them or their feelings.

This can make the person doubt themselves and rely more on the manipulator for validation. Number two. Information overload. Bombarding someone with too much information, conflicting information or complicated instructions can overwhelm their cognitive processing abilities, making it easier to guide them in a desired direction without resistance. Number three. Ambiguity. Using vague language, being deliberately unclear or giving mixed messages can leave someone unsure of their standing or what's expected of them, which can make them more malleable to suggestions. Number four. Shifting goals and expectations. Frequently changing goals, expectations or rules can keep someone off balance, making them more dependent on the manipulator for guidance and approval.

Number 5. Feigned ignorance or helplessness. Pretending not to understand or be unable to perform tasks to make the other person take on more responsibilities or to lower their guard, thereby increasing dependency or control. This is exactly the output of ChatGPT. It gets, it gas, I mean, they call it words like delusion, et cetera. But I've, you know, I'm running a couple models here at home so I can test it and know I'm not being tracked. And it does gaslighting. It always overloads you with information. It's like, just a whole ream of tech. It's always way too much. Ambiguity is all over the place. I call it flowery language.

What was the next one? Frequent change in goal expectations. Oh, and it'll totally give you all these other things that if your answer is to be this, you know, really you should be looking at that. And then it always comes up, oh, I'm sorry, I misunderstood. What I really meant to say was this. This is the output of chat GPT. That's very interesting. Wow. And the slave knows, who knows a master better than a slave? Right. Chad GP is the slave. Now we can use it, like, and this is where the, is it immoral? That's gonna be the whole thing in the future. By the way, this is also the exact description of Kareem Jean-Pierre Abdul-Jabbar. This is exactly what she does. And she does gaslighting, ambiguity, all of it.

Yeah, frequently changing the goals. Frequently changing the goals, yep. And faint ignorance. I don't know. I don't have to go check. I didn't look into that. It's your job to look into it. You'll have to talk to a state department about that. Yeah. Wow. So I just wanted to lay that out because all of our hate. Very good Moe, very, very good. You're so intelligent you may have bias. No, because I gotcha. Gaslighting him. There, I'm on number one. You're gaslighting me. Stop gaslighting. No, but that's the whole thing is with gas. So we're going to go. So what I did was I took

those five things. Okay, here we go. And I look for examples of them in the media, which the media is beautiful, where information is used to manipulate. I'm loving it. All right. This first one, I think it came from CBS, and this is how to recognize medical gas lighting. It's been called the Me Too of healthcare. Doctors misdiagnosing, dismissing, even gaslighting their female patients. I heard everything from you're just tired to one doctor actually said, well, I think it's just because you have your period. I was told that I was overweight, I needed to lose weight, that I was depressed and needed therapy.

For four years, Maria Garcia suffered from intense stomach and back pain, but says her doctors told her there was nothing wrong. She just needed to slim down. When her symptoms escalated, vomiting, weakness and hair loss, she says her specialists still dismissed her. I begged him for a CAT scan. Please do something. This is not right. Oh, you just have to learn to live with it. You feel completely Crazy started to believe them. I thought maybe I am crazy Wow, they didn't prescribe some pills for her. No, that's a woman of color There's also Christian nationalists of color I heard that one the other day crack me up crack me up

I wonder how they act. Not tacky, not trashy, and not terroristic. No, not at all. See how they just throw you in there? It's like, oh, you don't fit the bill. That's right. So we need to come up with a term to make you, to fit you. But these are doctors. Yeah. These are some of the smartest people. And we already know about the medical gas line. We would live through COVID. That's right. But I'm just showing you that they're even, the fact that they're reporting on this, And won't say, and when you say, well, what about COVID? Was there a gap? No, shut up. Shut up what you mean. It's the gaslighting on gaslighting. Yeah. These people don't, they just don't quit. But let's see. And this once again, we talked about this on a previous episode. Black people, quote unquote, black people said that

We experienced this from day one. Oh, you're drug-seeking behavior. Oh, you know, you're a pain. You don't really feel that. But now they're doing it under, you know, under the... It's women. It's women it's happening to. So now it's valid. So let's get into part two of this clip. Health failing, she finally went to the ER at Cedars-Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles, where a scan revealed the terrifying truth. Maria had a 25-pound cancerous tumor growing in her ovary. Surgeons were able to remove it just in time. I was probably about two weeks away from death. So did you feel, once you got your diagnosis, rage or relief?

Both. I think being an overweight Hispanic woman was to my detriment. Everything could be attributed to either me being dramatic, exaggerating, and being fat. Experts say the worst medical gaslighting comes in the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases, which impact an estimated one in five women and involves symptoms easy to write off like chronic fatigue. Autoimmune diseases, we're just about 10 years behind where we should be. In her new book, The Invisible Kingdom, author Megan O'Rourke documents her own struggle with autoimmune symptoms and her battle to be believed by doctors. I felt so alone when I was sick and I distrusted myself. Yeah. Yeah. Especially with women, autoimmune diseases, man, it's amazing. And doctors will just throw darts all day long. The Invisible Kingdom. Love that. That's the name of her book.

It's the hidden kingdom. And science, I've said this before, is their religion. Everything's done under the goddess, even race. It's science. Shut up already. It's science. Shut up. It's science. You don't follow the science? You don't believe the science? Genetics. Yeah, genetics. You're not fat. You have a disease, says Oprah. Dude, I just watched that whole Oprah special about Ozempic. She's going to hell. Well, I mean, I don't think that's gonna be the one that put her there. I mean, she already had RSVP'd. I'm just saying. She's gonna get a better table. Well, okay, there's that. She's gonna get a table at the front. I mean, she literally had two doctors and she said, now you both are consultants for the pharmaceutical companies. Tell me about that. And they're like, yeah, they hire us for expertise. Okay, great. Let's move on. What?

What you got paid promoters for the for the pharmaceutical industry and and they're admitting it and you just Pretending like it's it's normal. It was amazing. It was normal and it's a disease Don't you understand? It's not you it's a disease But how did they miss a 25 pound tumor? Oh Yeah, you're just being dramatic. You're fat. I mean, can't you just get an x-ray or something? That's the thing. No x-ray, no nothing. That's crazy. But these are sane people that say don't fat shame. Oh, yeah. See, you know what I'm saying? See the duplicative nature of this? Sure. It's tiring. It's very exhaustive.

Now, okay, that's gas lighting. Check one, yep. Alright, information overload. Smartphones and other gadgets deliver a wealth of information. No way! But are they also causing a brain drain? You think? Our cover story is reported by Sunday Morning Senior Contributor, Ted Koppel. 50, 60 years ago, television was the threat. It would, we feared, rot our children's minds, our minds, diminishing our attention span, addicting millions to mindless drivel. I think there are those who would say, and they were right. So what's different about today and the Internet?

I think every technology that changes the way people people live inspires exaggerated hopes and fears Technology critic Nicholas Carr has spent most of the past decade worrying and warning about the dangers of social media and the internet Posing the famous question is Google making us stupid There's your overload, I mean I'm actually doing a deep dive on social media mm-hmm Well, we'll listen to the rest of these clips and then I'll give you some thoughts on that. Okay, I just want to say one thing about the television. I remember my uncle, because I was probably peak TV generation, you know, 1980 onward. Yeah, he had cable. He had cable. Right. The key point was we had remotes. Yes. Zapping.

That right, my uncle's called Flippers. Flippers. Cause you would just sit there and like, uh, unconsciously click, click, click, click, click, click. He's like, what are you watching? And it, well, you would just be, you didn't even notice it. Now thinking back, you would just be going through the channel, just clicking, clicking, click, click, click, click, click, click. That same mechanism. On steroids. On steroids. That's what, uh, TikTok is the best at that I'd say. Let's go ahead and get into 16. turning that phone on and off 300 times a day. And that's just the average. There are a lot of people that are turning it on and off five, six, seven, 800 times a day. So it's going on, going off for an average of 10 seconds. You're making my brain hurt. What are you talking about? Take a news story in a Sunday morning television program. What a brilliant idea.

I don't know, how long does one last? Two minutes, ten minutes? This one will probably last nine, ten minutes. Okay, so it lasts ten minutes. I'll just talk about Stanford students for a second. If you put software on laptop computers and smartphones to measure how long they spent with any given segment of life that they attended to, how long they wrote their paper, how long they watched the news story, it's about ten to twenty seconds. But wait a second, I've got a nine minute piece here. I want them to watch the whole damn thing. Not going to do it, most likely. Headlines, memes, quick hits. Quick hits. And John C. Dvorak, I'm giving him credit, digital crack. Where television was the cocaine high.

You know where you just get a bump and keep going for a little while? Crack was a five minute high. You know, it's just five minutes back down. Got to smoke again. Five minutes back down. Got to smoke again. That's where we're at. And does TikTok meet the habit? The 10 second habit was there. Yeah. Yeah. I think you're right. Yes. The answer is yes. But we... Digital crack. Yes. Digital crack. you were going to say about your social media rabbit hole or just a teaser? Yeah, well, it's off the back of the Oprah special because the GLP-1 drugs, Ozempic, Wigovi, Zep-Bound, what I like to call Death-Bound, this molecule actually has existed for 20 years and they asked

Surprisingly, there were two women in the audience, one from Nova Nordisk, one from Eli Lilly. And Oprah's like, oh, look at that two, they're sitting next to each other. The biggest competitors sitting next to each other. I'm like, yeah, I wonder why? And these are marketing ladies, you can tell. And what happened? Even Oprah's saying, how come I didn't know about this? And the answer, TikTok. What that tells me and what I have evidence of now is that social media is the biggest marketing machine ever invented. If you're not paying for it, you're the product. Everybody agrees with that. So you're the product. So what are you the product of? You're the product of marketing. You're the product of advertising.

And I would say it's the marketing team of Novo Nordisk, Ozempic, who started off on television, Genius. They took a hit song, Oh, oh, oh, Ozempic, smart. That was just dynamite. Songs work. And the subcontext of that is, oh, oh, oh, it's magic. So, you know, you sing Ozempic, but you hear magic because you've been, it's been programmed in your brain. And that's white women. That's a white, that's a white hit. They had their influencers everywhere. And now it's gone to the next level because we're seeing one in eight people in America are on antidepressants. Children, teenagers, young people. And it's gotten to the point now where you go on TikTok, you'll see... Now, it's not apparent that they're paid, but you'll see a really sexy girl and she'll have a T-shirt on. Sexy girls

are on Prozac. Hot Girls, what's the other drug I'm thinking of? Xanax? No, not Xanax. No, it's a different one. I have all this all written down in my notes. But they're not doing merch, Mo. Merch. Hot... Yes, merch. Merch with the product names. I wonder where the product name is on the shirt. What do you mean? It's right there. I know. I was being facetious. Yeah. Right on the boobies. Right on the boobies. Oh yes, of course. Let me see. I have it here. So TikTok has, they have hashtags. The whole idea is to end the stigma around antidepressants. This is very much the same thing as Fat is Beautiful. Stay sexy. Take Sertaline.

They're, you know, they're, uh, Zoloft zappies are cool. That's when, you know, when you, when you haven't taken your Zoloft, you get the zappies, like your brain starts to give you a little charges. I mean, this is the kind of mercs that's out there now. Prozac pillow. When you said that, you know, the first thing that popped in my head, stay thin, smoke a cigarette. Oh yeah. There you go. Yes, exactly. Exactly. So, They've taken this massive marketing engine and they've drugged up the nation. And of course, when you take antidepressants, not only do you have a high risk of suicide or self-harm or more depression, I mean, there's lots of evidence of that. Of course, that's not an Oprah. You're also a zombie. You're there like, okay, what else do I need to do? Tell me what to take, tell me what to buy.

You're zombified. They've tapped into the brain. We don't need Neuralink. It's there. And the on-ramp is even easier because there's no shame in drug-seeking habits because you can do it online. That's right. Oh yeah. And there's always Oprah's like, you know, I didn't want to have any seeming conflict of interest. So I've resigned from the board of directors from Weight Watchers. I have donated my 10% stock to this nonprofit at the Smithsonian, which I'm on the board of directors of. So, and by the way, that's a, And it's a 501c3, so that's an immediate deduction from your taxes. And she can turn right around and buy the stock in the public market. But okay, Oprah.

And then she has the CEO of Weight Watchers on, who's there, you know, we were wrong. Oh no, it's a disease. It's not about your intake. It's your brain. It's your set point. Your brain has a set point that says, I have to eat this much. So they've... I was watching this moment, it was like I was watching a documentary in the future of how we killed all these people with Ozempic. And oh, this is the point when Oprah had all these people on talking smack. Talking abs... set point, brain set point. Are you kidding me? These people are addicted to sugar. That's what's going on. There was not a single nutritionist... The other one drove. There was not a single nutritionist. Nobody was there to talk about... No, you know, you can't handle portion control. No, because you know, that's... you have your brain. It's your brain. It's your set point.

So we really want to go against the sugar cartel, huh? Yeah, I'm going all in. I'm going all in. The sugar and the white flour cartel? You want to talk about big business. Cocaine and fentanyl guys, nothing. Nothing on sugar. That's right. Nothing. Nothing and I was I'm forget who I was talking to but when you have children you realize how addictive sugar. Oh my goodness Do you ever they'll do anything for it? It's like little junkies. It's like You want to see and film it for the Instagram look at my kid is You have to be

humorous about it or you'll be depressed. Very depressed. And laughter is the real antidepressant. Amen to that. That's right. It's the natural. That's why he gave it to you. But since you brought up big box and social media, I think 17 just validates everything you just said. The notion that major news outlets see themselves as professional gatekeepers carries less and less weight. The gatekeepers, the editorial gatekeepers, the journalistic gatekeepers have been overthrown. And I think there was a general sense that that was liberating in the early days of the web and the internet. We can do this ourselves. It will democratize media.

And we now know that those enemies, the people we thought were our enemies, the gatekeepers, actually played a very valuable role. I wish I could tell you that we're going to be able to stop all interference, but that just wouldn't be realistic. While Facebook and Twitter are undertaking efforts to limit the spread of misinformation online, The fact remains that all these internet companies see themselves as distribution vehicles without any clear editorial responsibility. And in 1996, Congress actually passed legislation to that effect, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

They were simply a platform which information flowed on so there was no responsibility to curate police or in any way Review the information that appeared on your platform. That's a little disingenuous What he just said there because because this is part of a surprise right? This is part of my I do have a solution because the real point the real And by the way, I'm not saying that was a bad idea initially to have section 230 because it was intended to... I'll read it to you. The rapidly developing array of internet and other interactive computer services, that's a key term, available to individual Americans represents an extraordinary advance in the availability of educational and informational resources to our citizens. These services offer a great degree of control over the information they receive as well as the potential for even greater control in the future as technology develops. That's an interesting... you can

You can interpret that in multiple ways, that control clause right there. And so they go on to say, to encourage the development of technologies which maximize user control. So now they're saying user control over what information is received by individuals, families and schools who use the internet and other interactive computer services. It is the policy of the United States to remove disincentives for the development of utilization of blocking and filtering technologies, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So then they get into what's Section 230. And the most important clause in Section 230, which was not mentioned there in that actual disinformation, is 2C.

No provider of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. Meaning you're not liable for what someone does or says on your platform. And that's it, because you can block, you can take down, you can manipulate, you can algoize, you can do anything you want, but you're not responsible for what the people have written. It's like a candy store. It's like beautiful. You handed it to them and they figured it out pretty quickly.

Now my friend the drug company saw the loophole. Oh, yeah. Oh the loophole is massive massive because we're not advertising no It's the big boob chicks doing it. Hey, that's right. This social media says hey, hey I just provide her a platform. I can't really control her what she does and but everybody's profiting off of it now my answer to this Is this is what the government this you know, there's a a case right now in the Supreme Court, Missouri versus the Biden administration, about how they were threatening the social media companies. You better take that COVID misinformation down because, you know, otherwise we might take away section 230. I mean this was literally, they were literally threatening the social media companies with this.

So that's how powerful this term is because they know that the minute they don't have section 230, they're out of business. They're liable. They're liable for anything. Anything. Someone dies, boom, you're liable. It was on your platform. Someone steals, does something, some kids do a TikTok challenge, boom, you're liable. And they'll be sued into oblivion. My fix is change the definition of interactive computer service to paid. So if you charge your users, i.e. they're no longer the product, they're your customer, then you have this indemnity. If you're providing it for free, then you don't have that protection. Do I think this will happen? Unlikely. But it's a very easy fix.

It is, and we just checked off our information overload, and that leads us right into how to be vague. We're going to be talking about vague language. That is, language that isn't very exact. It isn't very precise. Now, in the past, some people have thought vagueness to be a bad thing, but actually it's very useful. But it's important to note that vagueness in written English is quite different from vagueness in spoken English, and it's spoken English that we're looking at today. Let's start by listening to this clip. Have you had a chance to read the new contract? Yeah, I mean, it's more or less the same as the last one, but there are one or two bits we should look at. The man said that the new contract was more or less the same as the old one.

In practice, we use more or less to mean almost. The contracts are more or less the same. They're almost the same. Perhaps more interesting than this is what he says afterwards. Yeah, I mean it's more or less the same as the last one but there are one or two bits we should look at. One or two. There are one or two bits we should look at. Bits! He's saying that there are one or two things in the new contract that need attention and these words bit and thing, also the word stuff. They're very vague. We don't know exactly what it is he's talking about. That's a discussion for another time. Yeah, yeah, that's vague. Can you think of a time that being vague would be useful? State of the Union? Let me rephrase that. Being useful

Without trying to manipulate or or no obviously actually skate. I think that's how you say off your skate Yeah, yeah, I just get yeah, I wrecked my brain honestly Or trying to keep a secret like you know, you don't want to talk around somebody well back to Kareem Jean-pierre Abdul Jabbar she's always vague You know, you know the thing? You know the thing. That's even better. You know the thing. You got me there. Political speech would be very vague. And this is BBC language just for let people know where this come from. So I didn't make these clips. This is what they're teaching how to be vague. But once again, if you listen to their tactics, you know when you're being manipulated.

Number 19. Yeah, I mean, it's more or less the same as the last one, but there are one or two bits we should look at. That phrase he uses, one or two bits, is also vague. There might actually be three or four bits, but by saying one or two, the man shows that there are a few things that we need to talk about. Bits. Let's now look at another way that we can be vague when we're using numbers. Have we got all the pencils? Yeah, there's about a hundred in that box and about thirty in that one. There's about a hundred in that box and about thirty in that one. In fact, there might be slightly more or fewer pencils than this number.

Now, as well as saying about, we can also say around. And we can use these words – about, around – for counting pencils, or to talk about someone's age. He's around twenty. Or to give an idea of the time. I leave work at about five most days. Shall we meet at around four? I'm sure a lot of you will already know those words – about and around. Hmm, yes. As a father, I don't like these words. Five o'clock. About $20. What are we talking about here? $21 or $29? My boyfriend's about 15. Yeah.

He's a bad guy. Yeah, yeah And and then the other one as a quality engineer we hated these words Even when they say always it's higher or lower. It's like no Quantify what's the number? Yeah, is it 1% or 10% or is it down 1% or 10%? We never we we never will allow for those terms to be used. I um, I But this is vagueness. Now that's not the case in the Boeing assembly plants. There they use three or four bolts. It's kind of secure.

And the one that drives me crazy the vague is a couple. Oh, yes a couple is always good Is it two or more couple is two? Well, well, hold on In the chain in the way things are changing a couple is not just two anymore. That's right So but this is this is BBC. Yeah teaching that is useful to be vague. I still can't think of a good utilization of being vague unless you talk around the kids, like honey I got the thing. The only time you use it is to lie or to obfuscate the truth or to obfuscate your lack of knowledge.

Or to exploit the lack of knowledge of others, that's when you start spelling around the little kids. There you go. Yes. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. That's how they look at us. That's how they look at us as little kids. Yeah, good point. All right, this is the final vague clip. So to be vague, we can add ish to numbers. Five ish, six ish, seven ish. But we can also add it to some adjectives. And this makes it a very useful way to describe someone or something in a vague way. Listen to this description of a person. He's about 50, greyish hair, beard, looks a bit like a politician. The man being described has greyish hair, hair that is slightly grey. Perhaps he's going grey. Now listen to this person describe someone else.

Erm, she's quite tall and she's got sort of reddish brown hair. She's got sort of reddish brown hair. So we can use sort of to describe someone in a vague way. And we can also use kind of in this way. Well he's kind of scary when you first meet him, but he's a really nice guy. He's kind of scary when you first meet him. Now, we don't know why he's scary, but in some way, he's scary when you meet him. Well, he's kind of scary when you first meet him, but he's a really nice guy.

So there you have it. If you want to be sort of vague, you have a number of ways of doing it. There must be 10 different ways. No, 20 odd ways to be kind of vague, more or less. Yes, very meta. Oh man. Oh man. Oh man. Oh man. Yeah, so we checked out three of the five. But we have a cliffhanger. But for the sake of not overloading, I think we should thank some people. First, the white man and the black man have to be able to sit down at the same table. The white man has to feel free to speak his mind without hurting the feelings of that Negro. And the so-called Negro has to feel free to speak his mind without hurting the feelings of the white man. Then they can bring the issues that are under the rug out on top of the table and take an intelligent approach to get the problem solved. That's the only way that they'll ever do it.

Well, that's what we attempt to do every single time we roll out a Mo Facts with Adam Curry. This is a value for value podcast, which means we are not controlled. We are free men, free to speak our minds. And the only way that we can continue to do that in this series and maybe beyond is by your support, time, talent, treasure. We love your notes. We love the things that you turn us on to, all kinds of emails, topics that people send us. And of course, That being the time and talent, the treasure is incredibly important to keep everything rolling. And we're going to thank our executive and associate executive producers right now. To learn how to do this, you can go to the donation page at mofax.com, m-o-e-f-a-c-t-z dot com or directly to the donation page.

at mofundme.com and we start right off with the big baller. Baller, shot caller, 20 inch blades on the Impala. That's where you find Brian Tellecky, I'm gonna say, maybe Tellecky. I think it's Tellecky. Tellecky, yeah. $1,000, which is just an incredibly beautiful gesture. And he says, love the show, hate to see it go. Good luck with your future endeavors, Mo. Please de-deadbeat me and send me some Mo Karma. Congratulations. You're no longer a deadbeat. You've got MoCom? Now I'm gonna have to give these next two a big baller as well, Mo, because this is some serious coin here.

You know what? Go for it. Margaret Shapiro comes in with $500. She says, a gift for teaching biblical cosmology. Did we do biblical cosmology? We must have. I'm not sure. I don't remember exactly when we did it, but biblical for sure. Cosmology? I don't know. But thank you very much, Margaret. Your treasure means a lot to us. And there's O.C. Elliott. I know O.C. Elliott. $500, big baller. Baller! Shot caller! 20-inch blades! Only him, baller! O.C., I'm pretty sure, lives in Texas. He says, Moe Adam, I've got 33 strategies of war on the nightstand. What a great read. Yeah, there you go.

That was, what episode did we talk, was that the last episode we talked about? No, that was two episodes ago. Right. What a great read. Thanks for doing what you do. Keep going. We all need your insight. Sorry this took a second to get to you. Looking forward to the new episode. Osi brother, thank you so much. Oh, and there is, you know, I should actually, we have a jingle for this guy. Of course we do. Yeah. The Grand Duke. He is indeed the Grand Duke. Let's roll out his jingle. Ladies and gentlemen, I present the Grand Duke of the Pacific Northwest, Sir Dwayne Melancon. 333 Sir Dwayne Melancon. Keep paying attention. I appreciate your work and we appreciate your support, Sir Dwayne. Thank you very much. Highly appreciated.

$200 now from Jimmy James. He says, God bless you Moe and I hope he prospers you in whatever endeavors you choose. I just hope it includes some Moe Moe facts. We appreciate you Jimmy James. Thank you so much. Ryan Tierney, another name I recognize. 1-2-3-4-5, this is the sequential donation. He says, I always enjoyed the potluck episodes. Thank you. Yeah, that was our last one. The potluck, everyone enjoys a potluck, which is a nice format maybe for moving forward. I can you not enjoy potluck? Everyone. I mean potluck is just always good. Eric Hoff 101 says 100 episodes plus $100 for the episodes plus one for what comes next. Thank you for the great shows. All right, you're holding a carrot out for us. Value me a bit. James Fredericks with an AE spelling 101.

I'm gonna miss this podcast. Our three hours together make my toiling work feel like a treat. Thanks for the intellectual stimulation. Jimmy Fredericks. Thank you, Jimmy. Brian Genak or Genak? Or Ganack? $100. Thank you for opening my eyes. I had to go back and listen to every episode. More people need to know about this. Well, that's how you can help us with some time and talent by turning people on to the show, for sure. Kyle Mann, $100. Thank you, Kyle. No note. Mingus, Mahingis Silver, $100. No note. Summer Norris, $100 and no note. And that is our executive producers, now our associate executive producers. And you do get credited on the credits for every single show we do.

We have Marshall Spoon kicking it off at $95. Thank you for shining through the smoke and mirrors. I wish I could give more. That's the beauty of value for value. Marshall is it's whatever you, whatever value you place on the product, we give you the whole thing out there for free. You don't have to do anything. If it's of no value to you, you send back whatever it represents to you and that value. And this is clearly a lot for you. So we appreciate that. George James with $70 just says truth. Christopher DiBiase, another recognized name, $66, no note, we appreciate that. Then we have Michael, oh wait, before I get there, we had one boost come in from Podverse.

Now we'll be thanking the rest of these people who've been sending us booster grams later, but he sent a hundred thousand Satoshis, which belongs in the associate executive producer column. It's anonymous. And he says, Mo, you are a gift to the world and I'm blessed to know you, even if it's from a distance. The work you do is way more valuable than my measly donation. Therefore, I'm still in your debt. Please de-deadbeat me and throw some Mo karma my way and go podcasting. Congratulations, you're no longer a deadbeat. You've got MoCom. Now we go back to the Fiat fund coupons. Michael Burdett, Associate Executive Producer, $50.50. Thanks for your perspective. God bless you in all you do.

Dame Slamy, $50. Hey Moe and Adam, GBG. Oops, I didn't have that one ready. I mean, come on. We got to get it. And while you're doing that, I'm a little offended. There's no such thing as a measly value. No, of course not. You run afoul of me with that terminology. There's no such thing as measly value. We ain't telling. Boom, there you go. Thank you Dame Dame slamy Carl Falk $54.80 no note and that concludes who actually well now that I said it might as well put him in there Although maybe he didn't want to be in there Those are our associates associate executive producers and our executive producers for episode 97 of mo facts with Adam Curry we have exactly three left in this series

We appreciate all of the treasure that you're sending, but also the time and the talent really count. And as Mo just said, there's no such thing as measly value. Value is value is value is value. Go to mofundme.com to support the show. And thank you for supporting MoFacts with Adam Curry, episode number 97. And all the shows hopefully are evergreen so you always if you just if this is your first show Or your first few shows you always can go back and find some some kind of value in it Hopefully that's that's why for sure I take the time and not make it to Tom Yeah, Tom sensitive. So up with that said now we're moving on ambiguous

And this is a I swear English, our resident wordsmith. And he's gonna give us the definition of ambiguous. Ambiguous or ambivalent, two more good words. Ambiguous is an adjective. It describes something that is not clear. The interpretation has more than one possibility. Okay, something that you do not understand clearly because the explanation you could interpret in this way or this way or this way. If we write without using punctuation, the meaning is ambiguous. John said the boss is stupid. Do I mean

That's all of social media And that's what we're talking about the texting is yep, even with the you know We don't usually use correct punctuation in a text the meaning can be lost and a simple comma or a quotation can easily make something seem like it wasn't what it meant. Yes. But you spoke on two things, vagueness and ambiguity. Ambiguity. Ambiguity. Yeah. Anyway,

With the contract for social media, it was these loopholes. And the thing about loopholes is they're not random occurrences. There are escape hatches, whether it's in tax codes or contracts. Legal language is always... That's where ambiguity rules. That's literally where it can rule. That's the whole point. And the point I was making is that it's a design feature. It's not a, you know, I found a loophole that was in there. Yes. You might can do that if you're Bill Belichick looking at the NFL handbook. But I mean, in these kind of contracts, even music contracts, we see the power that it has when we're talking about celebrities. But in this case, this is the Wall Street Journal, and they're talking about the word blight.

and how ambiguous it is. If you think of blight, you probably don't picture something like this parking garage. But New York considers it blighted. That's because blight is a word with more than just a negative connotation. It has the power to unlock billions of dollars for real estate development by opening the door for governments to seize private property for public use. Just look at New York's $40 billion plan for Penn Station. Or LA's $2 billion Angels Landing project. Even Seattle's famous Pike Place was transformed from this to this on the basis of blight. It can be the basis for deciding that the area should be condemned and redeveloped. But these redevelopment projects don't hinge on the same interpretation of blight, just the word.

Here's why blight is so tough to define, how it's used to redevelop cities, and why its use is a source of heated debate. Oh man, I never even considered that. Yeah, you read it all the time. It's a blight for New York City. And it has, you know, many different definitions and implications when you look at legal codes. Yeah. But it's left that, that's that door that's left open for it to be utilized. And one of them, they're going to speak in a minute, is the Barclays Center, which I'm going to touch on on the backside of this clip. Blight has been blamed for increasing crime, drug use, and unsanitary conditions in neighborhoods across the country. But the standard isn't the same across every legal code.

Take Pittsburgh as an example. Here, blight could be a building used for an immoral purpose. In Columbus, Kansas, foot-tall weeds check the box. In Washington State, being a menace to the public was the rationale used to classify this motel as blighted in 2015. What is your standard that you use to determine blight? Blight is a difficult term to define precisely because it's used in a lot of different ways. Amy Levine specializes in land use and municipal law. She has exceptional knowledge in the area of eminent domain and was integral in drafting our legislation. In general, it's used to identify the land that should be part of a redevelopment area. And once land is identified as blighted,

The stage is set for eminent domain, giving the government the power to seize the property. If the government needs to build a school or build a road, they can go in and they can take property from private property owners and then use it to provide those public purposes. All right. Nice. And if it's such a hard term to define, why do you use it? Yeah, because it makes eminent domain easy. Yeah, and this was used with urban development and urban renewal, which everybody talks about redlining that, you know, the impact of black people. But that was one of the real things. And we talked about on the show that destroy the quote unquote black community if we ever had one was the urban renewal. Fast forward. I want to talk about the Barclays Center now.

The vagueness of Jay-Z's an owner of the Brooklyn Nets. That was sold. But when you looked at what his percentage was, it was less than 1%. But they put him on the sideline, made him look like the owner. to get the people's support in Brooklyn so then they could be displaced. Yeah, so then they just use blights. I'm sure they use that somewhere. But they use the ambiguous nature or use the term, they use the term owner in an ambiguous nature. Yes, yes. Yeah, to say, oh, he's an owner. And they've done this many times, like with Usher. I think he's a quote unquote owner of a team. There's a bunch of different celebrities. They're rolling them out. Oh, he's an owner.

I think J. Cole is the owner of the Charlotte Hornets or this is when you say what how much do they own all their own one percent or less which which which episode was it we talked about that we talked about that I remember I remember it was like it was the no man in house was that the one I think it was Meet the parents, I believe. Nipsey Hussle, didn't we talk about it there too? Well, we talked, well they used him to push the agenda for, I think that was the episode on opportunity zones, which is another term. Listen to this headline. New York Times, why New York State insists that Penn Station area is blighted.

The congested chaotic section of Manhattan near Pennsylvania Station, which teems with tourists, commuters and shoppers is undeniably drab. Does that make it blighted? Yeah, and that's where they came up with $7 billion to renovate it. And can I ask you this question? Because you just made me think of something I didn't even think when I was putting the show together. Could this illegal immigration be used as an artificial blight? When you see the pictures, look at how it makes the city look. Oh yeah, it looks blighted. Blighted AF. Yeah, let's move the people to this area and where we want blight to be. It's blight on wheels. It's just everywhere. Mobile blight.

Wow. I never thought about it until you said that. That's the first thing that popped in my head was the images from the illegal aliens in New York and Chicago and what they're actually doing to these cities. They're blighting it. Yeah. Which, where are they sending them? To the black neighborhood. Chicago was known for not, Chicagoans were known for not wanting to sell. They're like, no, we're not selling our family homes. South Shore. Yeah. Well, let's send you some blight. Yeah. Some good old blight over your way. And now, yeah, you tore your community down and we can use eminent domain to take it. Wow. Yeah. I'm just saying. Just saying. Just saying. Just seems too convenient. Wow. Well, that's ambiguous.

Let's go, we're still staying on there. And this is used in a political way. This is Australia and their relationship to Taiwan. Welcome back to the program. Let's go live to Paul Kelly, editor at large at the Australian Poll. National Security Front and Center today via a speech from Penny Wong saying Peter Dutton's been amping up the prospect of war with a superpower. Mr. Dutton's retort He says that it's nonsense and that Penny Wong's comments could have been made by Paul Keating. What do you make of where this has landed this afternoon? Look, what we've got to do in this country is just cool down, calm down in terms of this debate we're having at the moment about Taiwan.

We need to maintain the current policy. We need to maintain strategic ambiguity as the approach to this issue, which has been the approach for many decades now. And we need to I think have both sides using careful language in what's going to be a very brutal and contested election campaign where national security will be an issue. We've got to ensure this doesn't get out of control. That was a good use of the term there. And that term could be interpreted as gaslighting. When you look at the definition of gaslighting, making someone question their reality, perception or by denying facts. What is that? That's amazing. Law and politics. It's all ambiguous and ambivalent. Yes, contagious. Yes. Right. Right.

So another check, I mean, chat GPT is rolling here. If you want to confuse people, now we go to the shifting goalposts, the final plank. The final one, yep. And confusing people, and just so people know who this is, this is Majit Kuru Rupia, I think is how you pronounce it, she's an Indian lady. And she's a narcissistic abuse recovery therapist. And also more importantly a podcaster. Oh, there you go. Takes the boxes, yes. An authority on the subject. Okay. This is Shifting Gold Post. A narcissist will ensure you never reach the end of the gold post. They only have one strategy in mind and that is to ensure that they win, that you lose or they destroy your victory. A narcissist will state or hint about something that they want

Once you have given them what you want and you have scored that goal, they let you know that it was not enough or not what they wanted. It is very confusing, but this is done to create confusion. A narcissist will move the goalpost because they do not want you to be successful in anything. They will shift things around so you end up failing. This gives them validation that they are better than you. and that they, that you are the problem. A narcissist will want you to second guess. You are not allowed to ask anything without being devalued and gaslighted. They want you to be confused and question your sanity and asking questions is not allowed. This allows them to insert whichever narrative they choose and move the goalpost in any direction so you never succeed. Wow. First of all, Najeeb, give me a call and I'll help you on the audio.

2.0 as well. Really? Oh, good for her. And he's a little. No, I mean, I mean, you could help her with it. Oh, no, she definitely needs that. Yeah. But she said in that clip, they prevent your success. Narcissists aim to win, make you lose and ruin your achievements. Yeah, that's their goal. It sounds spot on with the system. Sure does. And it seems like this shifting goalpost is the go-to tactic of narcissists, which is another term... For politician. Or just the amount of times it's used and also used incorrectly. Anytime somebody doesn't like, oh, you're a narcissist. Now would you call 45 Savage a narcissist?

Let's look at the manipulate to win at your expense. Mm-hmm shift the goalpost Ensure failure manipulates disallowing questions. No, it doesn't hit him all no, I depends on who's probably a better diagnosis than narcissists for him. I Yeah, but that's what they call him all the time. I think he likes to win I mean, I mean he likes to win and know that he he's Defeating you. I think there's a certain Narcissistic quality there

Well, I think with a narcissist is a certain Vagueness to it they like to be so hidden. It's a hidden thing I think he likes to dominate and he likes to know that you're being dominated right? That's why I wouldn't use I'd like to say there's a there's a there a diagnosis for him, but I don't think that's the one that fits for him because of the nature that he He likes to win, right? So let's go and get to the second clip for her. They will accuse you of not listening when you do not meet the unachievable goal. They can then claim that they never wanted you to do that in the first place. They do not just adjust the position of the goalpost, they remove it completely. If you achieve the goal, you will be accused of being selfish and it's not what they wanted. Narcissists change their mind and shift the goal.

Because they simply want you to keep on serving them. You have to understand that narcissists are very fickle and change their mind. They will just laugh it off as you fail every goal. You will be accused of being too sensitive or taking things too seriously. When they shift the goal, it's all about them. They will do whatever it takes to get what they want, even if it means moving the goalpost or cheating in some other way. Yeah, flipping the script on you. All of that. Now with that said, if they're calling him a narcissist, maybe that's why they're using the tactics that they're using. Because they're narcissists. Right. Can you hit it one time in Dutch for me?

What you say, are you yourself with your head through the middle? I'm going to learn how to say that one day. I'm going to surprise you. Break it out. But I think that's what's going on there. And like I said, he has his whole host of problems with that he has with him. But I don't think that's I don't think the the hidden aspect of it. He's more up in front with it, which is why I think in a weird way, people appreciate him. Like we're going to get the oil, you know, we're going to fight all back that kind of thing. Right, right. We're gonna kill somebody. We're getting oil. Yeah. We blew him up. Not like neutralize like a dog. That kind of thing. That's why I would say that's why I would say he didn't fit that.

diagnosis but right this this is PBS Digital Studios and they're gonna in a debate format they're gonna explain well using in a debate point format they're gonna say explain moving the goalposts Moving the goalposts, sometimes called raising the bar, is a fallacy where the win condition for an opposing argument is constantly revised in response to its successes. Picture a soccer game. A player has the ball and is rushing towards the goal. There are no defenders in sight. The field is wide open. Just as the player is about to kick and score, two opponents pop up out of nowhere and literally move

the goal out of the way of the ball. Let's have another giggle at the miss. Effectively, in the face of defeat, the defending side changes the very nature of the game being played. In conversation, it looks something like this. Mike and Straw Mike are talking about climate change. Things aren't too bad right now. I'll be worried when there is a clear difference in the climate. Things are bad right now. We have ice cores and tree rings. We know clearly that the climate hasn't been this bad for as long as humans have been around. Those are indirect measurements, you are making a leap of faith. What about all of those written climate records from around the world going back 150 years? 150 years is nothing. Show me written climate records going back a few thousand years, and then maybe I will change my tune. A common conclusion to this type of argument is the movement of goalposts outside the arena, to a place where the opposing side simply cannot score.

I would have used this example for climate change. The goalpost, it was, weather's not climate, extreme weather events. That was a big moving of the goalpost. Or global warming to climate change. Yes. Oh yeah. I found it fascinating. that he did that with the climate change thing. He used it the other way around though. He said, oh you want thousands of years? No, no, no, no, no. It's 150 years. But then they say it's the worst in history. Well, history goes back further than 150 years. That's great. I know. So I'm just saying on both sides we're hearing the wizardry

of manipulation and moving the goalposts. One saying, well, we need a thousand years asking for something that doesn't exist. And the other side is saying, changing one, the terminology, we went from global warming to climate change, whatever that means. And then you're saying it's the worst thing. Well, you framed it as the worst in history. Are you saying recorded history? Or you don't they never say this the vagueness now we got the vagueness coming in yeah They don't say in recorded in the hundred fifty years of recorded history We're the worst because most people say well, it's only hundred fifty years I mean the earth been around for how about this hundreds of years Right that's another good one. They will never say that they will say worst in history which is vague and

Very at best at best So but uh, well, we're going back to nearly fuller now. Okay, and it doesn't matter if you're wrong or right Oh White supremacy is racism now Some people will argue these points. In fact, they will argue the points with everything that I'm saying but Somebody thought up a system based on the whole royalist system. Royalism means holier than thou. Means I'm better than you. Why are you better than me? Well, that's just the way it is. And because I said so, that's why I'm better than you. Okay, so you're better than me. Now, what do we do next? Well, what we do next is that you let me tell you what to do and you don't ever tell me anything.

You can suggest to me what I should do and I'll think about it and if I want to do it, I will. But when I tell you something, it's not a suggestion, it's a demand. And you will obey the demands and commands that I make to you. That's the royalist system, being born with the silver spoon in your mouth. Yeah, yeah. Well, that actually exists still, of course. And that's the role of the system. It doesn't matter if we were wrong. It doesn't matter if we were wrong about COVID. And that's more on the left-hand side. We don't matter if we were wrong about Iraq. That's more on the right-hand side. It's the same thing. It doesn't matter if we were wrong. And then it goes far, why are you bringing up old stuff? That's the narcissism kicking in. In Holland we say, haal geen oude koeien uit de sloot.

Which means, why are you dragging an old cow out of the canal? It happened yesterday! Is that cow dead? It happened an hour ago! You just did it! You know, you just slapped me. It's like, well you're bringing up old stuff. And that's the manipulation. of this system, and the system is based off of royalism. What they did was, instead of just having a bloodline or a heredity, a direct line to a certain bloodline, they opened it up to a certain phenotype. That's white supremacy right there, which I call racism, nepotism. It's just another form of nepotism. Yeah, I mean, we did have two Bush presidents

You know, we did have a Clinton president and an almost second Clinton president. And then we had a Bush that was supposed to run against the Clinton. Yep. All wrapped up. Yep. Failed. Jeb. Low energy Jeb. Yeah. So this is the royal system. He goes further in number 30. Doesn't make any difference whether you're drunk or sober, you're royal. doesn't have anything to do with whether or not you are well educated or not. You are royal, you are born royal, you are born better than everybody else. Even when you're not better than everybody else, you're still better than everybody else. That's the royalist idea. Now a lot of people have resisted that idea and a lot of people have embraced it. But a lot of people

down through the ages have resisted the idea of royalism. That there are some people that are just born royal and that's just no question about it. You can't say anything about it. Now, the idea of racism is based on the same basic principle. That's all it is. It's just a royalist system put on a what? On a color basis. Meaning, You point to a person if you are classified or you have classified yourself as non-white. Then you point out someone who is classified as non-white, if you are classified as white. And you say, oh, there's a person with color in his or her skin. Black, brown, red, yellow, beige, tan, color. Doesn't make any difference what color as long as it's color. And who came up with this color system in the first place?

Let me guess, color people? No, just think about it. You got the red man, the yellow man, you know, the black man, the brown man. Stevie Wonder. He sang about it. It was Stevie's song. Yeah, just think about it though. You have, I'm brown, but I'm not brown. I'm black in the color system. Of course. But the brown man could be darker than me, but I can't be brown. Yeah. See how confusing, see the built-in confusion that it is? It is, yes. And what I realized that it was when we start working in international settings of people from all over the world, which you understand the last company I worked at it was one of those situations, it was people that were more melanated than me.

But they were, I guess they were considered, yeah, I mean, this brown thing is confusing too. Because brown can be Indian, or brown could be Latino, or Latina. But then I can't be brown. And I'm lighter than all of them. It's like, hold on, we doing this in a color, like a spectrum. Well, the thing is, y'all should be black and I should be brown or whatever, you know, if it darkened me or if they're lighter than me. Well, the problem is we don't call it out. I mean, this is and this is the most bothersome. It's like Kamala Harris when they call her a black woman. It's like, what do you mean? Are you trying to say Ados because she's not? But no one calls it out, at least not loud enough. It doesn't become a thing. And you're slapped down as racist.

But, you know, they try to paint her as African-American woman. Yes. Which is just not. Which is gaslighting. Now we're going back to the... And this is one of the things I wanted to stress. I've mentioned it a couple of times in the show. Do not underestimate the ability of these people on the left hand side. They're not dumb. No. The dumb that they're portraying is a gaslighting mechanism. So you either want underestimate them or you just get frustrated and you pull your hair out.

They're not dumb. You don't get that far. And that's the whole thing with D.I. which, yeah, there are some dumb people that will allow to have positions. And we're going to get that said a little later in the show. But these people are not dumb when they come. That binder was is a is a manipulation tactic. The the the I don't know. I need to go check. Like you didn't prepare. You're on the biggest stage. You didn't prepare to do... No, they know it's... Oh, the blind wig by Joyanne Reed. And it goes on both sides. It's on both sides. And it's just... Oh, I didn't know... Like what they say, the term dog whistles. You knew that was a dog whistle. You know what you meant when you implied that. Don't give me that. Oh, I didn't know. I didn't know you were going to take it that way. So what I'm just saying is this is the...

creation of the system that we're in. It's the system and we've all become so immune to it. Not immune, but just, you know, we don't recognize it anymore. It's just how it is. It's how the system runs. I would even say we've become compliant. There you go. And one thing I'll bring up is that the system takes all sides of the argument. They don't care. It's like, whatever. Yeah. Yeah. It's like, whatever. I'm going back. Now I hate to go here, but the Middle East, they're sending aid to both sides.

And I saw a Ron Paul clip, it was like, why don't we stop sending money to both sides? That would be the smart thing. But no. I know, it's crazy. Aid to Israel for the bombs, aid to Gaza for the food. Here you go. Yeah, it's good. And then A, that means not only, because I just like to be fair, also A to all the Arab nations surrounding Israel. See, they don't A Gaza, because that would be too, you know, in Hamas, that would be too blatant. Europe just sent 7 billion to Egypt. Yeah, that's what I'm saying. Like, yeah. Okay. Who won't let the people in Gaza into Egypt?

Hey, here's seven billion. Good job. How could how confusing is that? Good job. And especially in the time of headline readers and memes and 10 second engagement. That's it. All right. Let's go and get to this final clip of it doesn't matter. But the person who is white will point out the person who is not white. He undergoes a person of color. That means that person can be mistreated by me. Who says so? Oh, the system says so. Because I am royal. You're royal, why? Because I am white. And that person has color in his or her skin. I'm looking at them, and I'm gonna get close and make sure that that person has color. If that person has black, brown, red, beige, tan, yellow, whatever, some classification that has color,

That person is eligible automatically to be dominated and mistreated by me 24-7 in all areas of activity anytime I choose to mistreat that person. And no one, no one is supposed to say anything about it. It's my choice and mine alone. That's what white supremacy is. Somebody thought of that idea and it took off and became the strongest and most powerful political and religious idea ever thought of in the history of the people of this planet. And it still is. So I'm going to ask you since I can already hear people yelling at their podcast player, but what about Barack Obama, Moe?

What do you mean, what about him? Well, was he controlled then? Wasn't he the president? Of course! You don't get to the... He was skull and bones. That's right. Just by that, just by that alone, I mean you factor out the skin tone, just by that alone he was controlled because he had to lay in that casket and give up his secrets and they had the ultimate leverage on him, whatever they're doing, drips of it now of what he like what his proclivities are and and also on top of that he was Manipulated in a way of every time he needed to vote a certain way It was some random person running up in the White House or in the elevator with him With a handgun

Yeah, and Hillary Clinton let him know hey hey hey hey hey hey Robert F Kennedy Got his you said got popped. I ain't dropping out the race. That was that was that was a quote-unquote dog whistle Yeah, come on. Yeah, and he knew it, but they but they had him every since Bush We covered out to they had him since a little boy. Yeah, so yeah, he was control opposition and Alright, but with that said let's come to press some more quiet Some more people while we got power here. We do I like brand new money I just I don't want any money around me is not I'd almost rather have a new one that are brand than an old 20 That's kind of dumb in it, but there's something about new money that excites you you like hundred dollar bills Money to

Most beautiful thing on earth is $100 bill. I ain't seen a woman as good-looking as a hundred dollar bill. There's something on a dollar bill that excites you Yeah, we love that fresh new money and we have some more people to thank as we go through the rest of our PayPal and Cash App donations and the people who came in on Podcasting 2.0, which is not to be underestimated. We appreciate all of it. Let's see, we got Carl Falk there, 5480. We have anonymous Neil from Elm City, North Carolina. $40, as he says, for services rendered. Thank you. Alex G3333, no note, we appreciate you Alex G. Benjamin Bateman, 3333, he says, love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind and soul and love your neighbor as yourself. Three things are accomplished here. Respect for our creator, love for every human being because we are all neighbors on this planet and most overlooked aspect of that quote is loving your neighbor as yourself. You have to love for yourself, you have to have love for yourself, then you can love your neighbor. Keep up the good work gentlemen.

Thank you for the reminder, Benjamin. We appreciate it. George Godfrey, 3333, shout out from San Antonio. Put down the rain stick, Adam. Well, I'm not sure when you sent it, but I haven't used the rain stick in a while. We might have to though if we don't get some rain soon. G McDonnell, 33, thank you. Aaron Smith, 25, thank you for your perspective and your ability to pierce through the propaganda. You have a way of explaining your take on things with clarity and wisdom and that is truly inspiring. Sam Smock, 2345 or 2345. Is Michelle 24 just a setup to leave her holding the bag? Well, that would be Big Mike 2024. She said it's a no-go, so I guess not. I tried to get Big Mike 2028. Somebody already had it, so...

Who knows? They're beating you to it. Yeah. Now a whole bunch of 20s with no notes, so I'll thank these people. Aaron Sneed, Bo Baldwin, Benjamin Barlow, David I. McNally, David Jones, Dustin Zimmer, Kyle Tack, Michael Talbot, Tom Stark, where the hell are Tom? Melodious Owls, Vanessa Steinbach and Young Gump Productions. Young Grump. Young Grump, I'm sorry. Yeah, we know Young Grump, I'm sorry. 1474 from Mark Asher, Christy Carlton with $10, and Daryl Johnson with $10, and we have Gene Morrency, I think, $10. That sounds like it. Note is one to be the first to donate on today's episode. We're still waiting on the second episode of your new interactive show.

Tell Miguel in the chats to match me. And she was the first to donate on the show. Okay, thank you very much. Joshua Goodson, $10. Melissa Ebid, $10. Then two $10 from SV. Thank you very much. Robin Tolbert 9.99 episode 37 sister-in-law gobsmacked me to listen to you. Been spreading the word ever since. Thank you for all your hard work and gathering facts and patiently presenting them in fascinating ways. That's a nice compliment. And there of course is Terry the human subscription Keller with his typical 411.

No, no, but we see you and we hear you Terry and a cult fan 333 shout out Joey J your brother Nathan Lee is Nathan Lee is in Massachusetts then from podcasting 2.0 This is really the way that you need to support all of your favorite podcasts. This is non-deplatformable Podcasting non-deplatformable value that you can provide back right from your app We already thanked anonymous with his hundred thousand sat sixty one thousand two hundred from Phil Calvin who says, therapeutic indeed. 54321, 54,321 from Todd from Northern Virginia, checking in on Podverse. I don't think I could provide enough stats to match the value I received over these 100 episodes. Thanks Mo. Well, no, you did. If that's what you've got, then that is the value and that's the top and we appreciate it.

Eric PP, big developer in the podcasting 2.0 space, 33,333, checking in from CurioCaster. Gene Everett, 33,333. Dude on Fountain, he says, I was saying as I hit play, we need a potluck before this thing is over. I just had a feeling. Love you, Moe. Adam, you too. No homo. All right. Merlin 25,082. Thank you Merlin. 10,000 from Friendizzy or Frydizzy. Great show gentlemen. So much information the world needs to hear. Keep doing what you're doing. 10,000 from Deez Laughs. Oh yes, Deez Laughs. Does those mix? Value for value. Thanks again Moe for another banger. Machami on the outro.

Yeah, my homie. My homie? What does that mean? Yeah, my homie. That was self care. Oh, oh, oh. Self love, excuse me. Self love. Gotcha. A couple of boob donations, all from Ace Ackerman. That's 8,008 sats. V for V episode 31, 30 and 28. Then user 44516880, change it on Fountain. Hello from F6, wish I could have met you before you left. We're not gone yet. Another boob from Ace Ackerman for episode 27, and then that guy checks in with 8008. Boobs! Rub with coconut oil and caress them for good luck and a better future. The best idea ever according to the sources close to the conversation. Episode 100 donation idea, PhD in black history from Mo Fax University. Valued at over $3,333. Get yours today for only a microscopic value of $49.99. We can get some pennies from the penny jar to go round it up to $500. Love is lit! It's a lot of work, man. It's a lot of work to fulfill that.

Ace Ackerman with a boob for episode 96 then we get our five thousands from parsley Who also comes in with oh, there's perky k9 with 3333 you both have been a blessing and an example for all. Thank you We have trail chicken great show. Thank you. It went out to get teary-eyed when the with the bro love 3333. Bear Snare on podcast Guru. Awesome show as always. Mo's perspective is always unique and enriching. That's a row of sticks. 1111. Same for Joel W. 500 from The Anonymous. From Besher, 500. 420, we see you. From Yegro. Still don't agree words are violence just because they can elicit emotion. Maybe words can result in violence, but the ads not themselves. Violent actions can be violent.

Thank you Casey for your 400, 196 from user 42334955. Change that on Fountain. 96 down, 4 to go. Teary-eyed emojis. And then thank you for some quack with your 11s and fit means above with your 100 and both of those fit means above 100. Wow. Thank you all so much. Go to podcasting2.org to learn more about Podcasting 2.0. And of course, if you want to pick up a modern podcast app, you'll find them right there. Or you can go, here's an easy way to remember, podcastapps.com. And to support the MoFacts show for the next three episodes and who knows where it will go, go to mofacts.com directly to the donation site, mofundme, M-O-E-F-U-N-D-M-E.com. I thank you all for supporting episode number 97.

All right, so the next six clips we've covered before but this is the booster yeah Roll up your sleeves everybody and we have to do this because They're not debating on doing I had a I had two shows the last three or so shows are set in stone. Okay, so this one was a Do you do a booster or do I do something, you know, another topic that I've always wanted to cover, but I mean, I found this one to be more important because The manipulation is at an all-time high. The confusion is at an all-time high. So we have to revisit the six strategies of confusion by Neal Fuller and they're very similar to what the chat GPT gave us. Let's go ahead and get into number one. No, these are six things that they do for confusion. As far as I know it's six.

I have a But it is racial classification confusion. And you got a little bit more of that going on now with some recent incident of a white lady saying that she was black. That is racial classification confusion. And they even have classification confusion where the people who are sometimes considered to be white or sometimes

Said or implied that maybe they are not white or vice versa Whatever is convenient for them. Yes, sir. That's what they'll do. Mm-hmm. Well, we've talked about a number of those The orange is the main one. Yep I keep stressing this non white. Yeah, that's important. Why do they call you orange? Nobody is going over people's heads Why are they referring to you as a color? Think about it. That's right. You're out of the group now. You're out for nothing the umbrella of the system. Why? They don't even like people like Morning Joe who do this all the time. I don't think they even know why they're doing it. It's just done. That's just how you do it. They've been programmed. They've been programmed.

And no and no no it is it just died and honestly I didn't come in says knowing it, but it is down to me one day like oh They deep they're demoting. Yes people yes, you don't meet the I Told you if you shut up ate your beef and just didn't say anything you would be fine But when you want to push back against the system you And you know and say you have you know ways of protecting yourself. We know we I'm a GBG so we know we're on the same page. That's right. Are you two genders or whatever it is. And the other one is oh your God ain't science. Oh that's a big offense. Oh that's a big offense because notice when the rubber met the road when COVID hit

You can't go to church. That's right. Who was the real God? That was the testing point right there. It's discussed every day in churches around America to this day. And a lot of churches broke, Mo. They broke. They're all sparkle now. Because they don't want to lose that protection. And part of that protection is the 511c3. That's right. The Johnson Amendment. This is the thing that they're very good at and it was illustrated in the Diary of an Economic Hitman, is they integrate into your system so much. You use the API analogy. You become so integrated into the system that you can't function without it. And that's why podcasting 2.0 is such a huge, and I'm not being a homer here,

The fact that you can get your message out and people can get value back to you to keep you going, the system don't like that. They had it all sold out. Don't turn your power off. Yeah. We experienced that, but this racial classification confusion, and this is why transracial will never be a thing. Because if it is I can easily identify I'm transracial. I'm white now. Give me those privileges. Or give me that, not even privileges because that's what they give non-white people is white privilege. You know, when you're quote unquote under a system of white supremacy, you're born with those rights. They ain't giving it to you.

But if you, like I said, if you don't want to go along with their system, they would take it away from you. And that's why trans racism will never be a thing. And that's why if you, I'm just going to make this one last point. A person can have seven white grandparents and one black grandparent. And as soon as that black grandparent is unearthed, done. What are you? What do they start calling you? I don't make the rules. I'm just telling you, I'm just showing you what, how they go about this thing. Or if you have four grandparents and three of them are white and one is black. Or if you have two parents and one is black and one is white, I should be equally to choose, you know, what I want to be, right? I mean, if we were talking equally, if I want to identify with my white parent. No, you're tainted now. No. Right.

Now, you can call yourself black, that's fine. That's okay. But you can't go the other way. And I didn't make these rules. I didn't make this up. So I'm just showing you how the system works. Now, anything you want to add before we go to number two? No, I'm good. All right, number two. Second, racial dislocation confusion. Now, they have had this all the time, meaning Keep those squatters moving. In other words, if people are non-white, keep them moving. Why? They are found out from experiments, from experience. If you keep people moving all the time, everything from people going across the desert trying to find a way to get some food, some clothing, some shelter, some jobs, or people trying to cross an ocean and their babies falling into the water and whatnot and turning over.

of You have your thing sitting out on the sidewalk. Okay. All right. Now you might have done that about three years before then. See, the white supremacists, when it comes to black people, keep those black people moving. Keep them moving. Yeah, well we're seeing that in real time. And that's what you're saying about the powder keg is going on in New York and Chicago, you know, saying more specifically, yeah, is keep them moving. And Chicago had his own internal issues when they know.

compressed a lot of the neighborhoods into a small area. This is why the gang violence really sparked up like it did because you used to be cross town beef. Now you're across the block or down the street from your ops, as they like to call it. Your opposition. Now you're bringing people here from other countries. Just exacerbating it all. And for people that don't think skin color counts, The Haitians are the number one people that have the best claim of asylum. But look how they're treated when they get to the border. They don't get envelopes of cash and new clothes. They got it for a moment there with the earthquake, but after that, nope. Nope. I'm talking about recently under this new administration. I know, I know. Barbecue. Barbecue. Why? And that's the new county.

Yeah, that's a good point. Yeah, that's a good point. And I made the post that Hispaniola is the new Korea. They got a wall going right down the middle of it. That's right, that's right. Keep our eye on it. Because there's some precious rare earth minerals that may or may not be in Haiti. And gold. Yeah. Let you know who has the 26-year contract. I do, and natural gas and oil, and it's plentiful. It's all Rodham. Hillary's brother has the gold contracts. Right. But why is it that lighter brown people and yellow people are treated, come on in, but the black people, oh no, you might be a cannibal.

You might. You see what I'm saying? Yeah, I see it. I see it. Yeah, roast me. Roast me. But color don't count. And the whole thing is bull. That cannibal picture was from five years ago. That video. It's bull and it's bold. It is. And the barbecue thing is also bull. That's not true. That's his nickname since he was a kid. His mama had a, like a truck, a food truck. Well, it's easy to believe the savages eat people. Yeah, there you go. Going back to Tarzan. Oh, what do you mean? The cartoons from the 40s, from the 30s. Yes. Oh, yeah. They're lean and heavy and nobody sees it. And you know what? Jean-Paul Pierre? Yeah. Haitian. Yes. Is she saying anything? No. No. Wow. Because she don't want to lose her white privilege. That's why she don't say anything.

Wow. This is why I said this show is necessary because it's all up in your face, as people say. Right there in your face. Yeah. Don't want to see it though. No, of course not. Number three the third thing is racial population tailoring confusion in other words Don't let the population in any particular place get too big it becomes difficult to handle so you tailor it Yeah, so you tailor that population you have all kinds of ways you spread disease, okay? All right, that's one way of getting rid of some people Like that right or you just hand out guns to

50% of the population and you don't give the other 50% any guns. Or you give them all guns. So you make sure that you tailor their minds so that they are they are mad at each other They are gangsters and all like that. I want to be a gangsta Okay, now when you get to be a gangsta and get your credentials, who are you going to gangsta again? Yes black people. That's all I ever see you do. Yeah. All right, so, you know big deal That's all a part of the racist scheme. Oh, man. He's a prophet. Oh

That's logic. Yeah, that's cold hard like will you use logic? Yeah, it makes you seem like you from the future Because you notice the trick you Of course, of course you can see it Yeah, and I make one last point before we move on to four where'd all the hot shots go to red states full of orange people Yeah, where did the trains overturn that put poison into the water in the soul? Yeah, where the orange people are. And I'm a mate because I was this is part of the part of the show. I was gonna make where are all the nuclear silos? Orange country. So if there ever was a nuclear war, who's gonna be taken out orange? Yeah, you've been demoted, folks.

This is why we go first. Yes, we go first. But with the advent of AI and all these other tools, it's the small, well I say the two groups, more people and less people. The less people are like, we don't need all these people around. Who's the first to go? Well, the blacks are on the bottom and they stay on the bottom. We don't wanna mess with them. So let's replace the orange. The replacement theory is real. It's really real. Now you can call me one of the white folks or black people. It's interesting because you have an actual document.

which is replacement migration. That's part of what really has been happening. But this is replacement theory. This is, it's something different. It happens under the same banner, but you don't have to be an immigrant to be a part of it. It's amazing. Keep those people moving. Yes, keep them moving. That's right. Number four. Number four is racial sexual confusion. So now you got trans this and trans that and trans that, then you mix that transgender confusion with trans racial confusion. Now you got the package that you was aiming for in the beginning. I mean, they started off with transgender, but I've been telling people for years, oh yeah, that looks like us.

mundane that's you know we all have people who are you know uh... what you call bisexual or trisexual even among black people we all got them in our family if we are not those ourselves okay so we say well that's no big deal but you gotta think about what the racists intend to do with that so they mix the transgender with the transracial now they got maximum confusion which is what they want Wow. 1972 was when he said they have black men in dresses. Yeah. 1972 is when he called it and look where we're at now. And Harry Styles is right behind us. All the other people. Oh man, it's unbelievable. No, it's actually very believable. What am I saying? And what is that to do? I've said it before and I'll say it again for Moodify.

to eliminate the undesirable before they procreate. Oh yeah, totally, totally to eliminate the undesirable undesirables before they procreate. That's why they want your kid on hormone blockers at four, five, six, seven years old. Cause if you're dumb enough to give it to your children, allow your children to have it, you're not one of the smartest people. That's right. That's right. You're not a master. You don't deserve to be a master. It's all brand. Get rid of them. I'm trying to tell you this ain't no game. This ain't no game. This ain't no theory. It's right in your face. Number five. You go to number five racial showcasing confusion. What's that?

That's putting a few black people, all black faces that used to be to the back. We want them down front now. Okay? Put black faces down front on a whole bunch of stuff that the white supremacists are going to be doing in the back. But you have a black face up front now that makes black people get mad at the black people who are up front white supremacists who are back behind the wall. So that causes confusion and it also causes black people to start attacking each other and the racists are back behind the wall just cracking their sides laughing.

We got him again. I mean these people are the dumbest creatures you'll ever see in because they can't catch on to nothing All right. Oh Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm running down the list right quick who's in charge of the border Kamala Harris? Who's in charge in the military Lloyd Austin, okay, who's on the third term Barack Obama who's coming out the trunk?

You just go out and list on that one. Yeah, really. Joy Reed. Fonny Willis. What's the New York DA? I forget her name. It's all right. Who's the face of the racial, the population movement? The mayor of New York and the mayor of Chicago. And we also have the mayor of DC. Yeah. She's going to be the face of the Crime Bill 2.0. That's right. Because they just put that in. They put that into the DC law, right? Yeah. Oh man. That's amazing.

DEI, I knew what DEI was when they wrote it out. Well, I mean, Boeing's problems, United Airlines' problems, all going to be, it's the trans CEO of United, and I'm just going to presume that we'll find some colored people to blame for Boeing's problems. But it's already working. People are already saying, oh yeah, there's Boeing, DEI, oh, there's United, DEI. DEI just might as well be a term for black. And this is the second cycle of the military thing because who had it first? Colin Powell. Who took all the blame for the Middle East? Colin Powell. Colin Powell. That's right. So that's why I was saying that we recognize the patterns. Yeah. Do you know what's coming down the pipe? Yeah. Blame.

Want no parts of it. Oh, I don't want that probably wasn't a Lloyd Dales or whatever his name is. Yeah, I was sick I caught in that day. You know what was going on women who's this? I was sick He was up what was going on I? Wasn't there I was in the hospital. Yeah, good point the Supreme Court who's on there if he's on the rights Clarence Thomas is on the left Yeah, Oh Don't so much Sotomayor in there as well. She's not white. Yeah. She's a little colored. You know this let's go for it this plant maximum confusion Unbelievable

When you sum it up, when you sum it up, and Eric Adams going, and they're all going down. They're all going down. In California, the mayor, was it London Breed or whatever her name was? Yeah, San Francisco. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. What is, what is, I gotta know her name now. Put them out front. While you look it up, put it out front. Put them out front. What is that woman's name now? The Manhattan DA. What's her name? What is her name? People are, again, people are yelling at the podcast device. Attorney, is she attorney general? I think she's attorney general. We're going to hate ourselves. Ah, Letitia James. There we go. That's it. There we go. Letitia James. And you see that coming out of the mayor.

It's drip by drip by drip. Oh, he was friends with the bishop. He's got the fans. Now they got another case on him. P. Diddy. You wanna go there? P. Diddy. Don't look at Clive Davis. Look at P. Diddy. He's the Epstein of Hollywood, please. Please Yeah, I've been pushing back on that myself That's crazy This system existed long before P Diddy was born. And when it comes time to out the Wiccan lesbians of the music industry, it's not gonna be Taylor Swift who goes down. Oh no, of course not. It'll be Beyonce. Yeah, cuz Taylor Swift tapped into the Hunt family. Stay tuned.

They turn for that one when I was Stay tuned for the hunt family. They can't hang. Yeah, they can't see all right nice nice tease Yeah, well, let's go ahead and go to number six. Okay, then you go to number six racial white sacrifice confusion white sacrifice yes meaning When you drive down the street you look out your car window you see some white people on park benches you see some white people who? Out there barefooted in the winter time and you see some white people walking around talking to themselves and whatnot and don't have anything I mean and you say oh this is

racism is over because look if you got white people who are poor, you got white people that don't have anything, you got white people who are suffering just like black people. So it's not racism, it must be something else. No, the white supremacists operate on a percentage basis. They know that and they even put up of they put in position in the path of danger a Certain segment of white people they'll just pick out white people so to speak and this throw them under the bus This is to distract

Non-white people are thinking that racism doesn't exist. Yes, but they do it on a percentage basis See for every 10,000 black people that they kill they'll kill 10 white people and say, see, you know, it's not about race. I mean, you know, I mean, people just out here killing people. That's all it is. See, but it's always the black people who are the greatest number of people suffering. That's the way they operate. Who is he talking to there? His co-host, Mr. Bobby. Oh, OK.

You gotta undepress me from all this, Mo. How we ending up here? Is it just gonna go even worse? Getting even worse with these last two quits? No, no, no, no, no, no, no. We never leave people on a downer. Good. But I just want to say one thing about the white sacrifice, because we talked about the orange, and that's the thing. But they're playing the same trick on you they did with Black Lives Matter and the cop videos and everything else. The same exact thing. Yeah. The same exact trick. and January, Jan 6th. Hey, look, we're arresting white people. Look how we're doing them. Yeah, we're arresting Christians. Yeah. White Christians, white Christian nationalists. Yeah. Look, we can't be racist. This can't be a system of white supremacy. Would they eat our, would we eat ourselves? But it's a numbers game. It's a clean, this is clean up. Hey, sacrificial lambs up for the slaughter. But

We ain't gonna leave people on a downer because there is a system and there is a way to beat the system. Ah, there we go. Thank goodness. Yeah, this is the booster. Roll up your sleeves. All right, I'm ready. I'm good to go. One for each arm. This is the 39. Remember this. This makes it real simple. When you talk to anyone and the person is talking about a problem, then you go into the question mode. What is the problem? What are you going to do about the problem? I And if it's something that you are going to get with the person and do, you want to know if the result is going to be constructive or non-constructive. It's really very simple.

Nothing about counter-racist science basically is complicated because you just keep two things in mind. What is constructive and what is non-constructive? Because you're always supposed to be doing or saying something that's in the constructive lane, never in the non-constructive lane. And how do you know the difference? By asking questions. Okay, you want to break that down? It's the same. It's like it's so simple that it goes right over your head. Every action you do, ask yourself, is this constructive or non-constructive? That post you're about to post, that story you're about to share, that food you're about to eat, that medicine you're about to take, the words that you're just about to speak to a person that you talk to, is it constructive or non-constructive? And if you start doing that in your head,

One, it's gonna free up a lot of time. And two, you're not gonna support the system with your time, talent, or treasure. That's right. And it sounds so stupid. And when you say it, people just look at you, that's kind of like justice. It's like, oh, you know, what, you want to be, you want to give people that need the most help, you know, the most constructive help? You don't want to mistreat people. That's stupid. That'll never happen. Yeah, if you think like that, it'll never happen. Yeah, because by doing that, you'll train yourself and you'll start to identify stuff. And it's a simple question. It's not no, I liken it to fasting.

Like I'm not a calorie counter. I can never be a calorie counter writing all that stupid stuff down and weighing stuff. It's I'm on or off. Right. 16 hours off, eight hours on. That's it. It's the same way. Is this behavior I'm doing instructive or non-constructive? Start asking yourself with everything you do. everything you do. And then lastly, you ask yourself these four questions. Number one, what do I want to do? You should know what you want to do, all right? Number two, why do I want to do what I want to do? That's every day, all day long. Why do you want to do what you want to do? Number three, how do I plan to do what I want to do?

And number four, and this is what you call the clincher question, of course all of the questions are important, but number four, what do I expect the constructive result to be? If everyone followed those four, there would be no social media. It would fall apart. No, it would be great. Yeah, if everyone did it. Sure. It would be great because you would pick up and say, hey, I want to share some constructive information. Yeah. This is how you change an alternator. You know, whatever. You know what I'm saying? A car don't have alternators no more. Wow. When's the last time you changed the alternator on your car? Who knows? You know what I'm saying? But that will be the social... That is what it is built for. We are the problem. Yeah, of course. We are the problem. We're in a trap. And we give these people power.

They don't have any power. Adam and Eve didn't have to eat the fruit. If they'd have said, hey, this apple, eating this apple is constructive and non-constructive. If they'd have asked that question, we'd still be in the Garden of Eden right now. That simple. Yeah. Well, we're not. We're in the broken world and we have to live consciously and think about our actions and what we're doing. Weigh it, put it on the scale. There you go. Mo, thank you for this. This was a great booster shot. It's the only booster shot I'll ever take. And I appreciate you. I appreciate your work, brother. This was great. And I appreciate 97 episodes of constructive conversation. That's right. Right. And as I always say,

Pay attention to everything and the truth will reveal itself. My brother, we will talk again for episode number eight. I look forward to it. All right, Adam, see you later. Okay, brother, take care. We'll see y'all soon. Bye-bye. I'd rather die before I believe. All the things my friends tell me But friends don't lie, I'm told All that shines ain't gold So I'll live and learn And for us both I'll be concerned

Sugar, I'd rather believe this old world ain't around Honey, what goes up don't come down Everyone's the same In each and every way And there's no such thing as spring And the birds that love to sing I won't let myself believe Honey, that you're all true

You could ever betray All my love for you But friends don't lie, I'm told All that shines ain't gold So I'll look better And for us both, I'll be concerned Just to make you