3 chapters across the catalog
The conversation shifts to how the system of white supremacy now utilizes the "religion of science" to enforce its agenda. Failure to "follow the science" results in the loss of livelihood and freedom of movement, paralleling how the historical Catholic Church treated heretics. This ideological enforcement is framed as a scientific perfection of social domination, where the system determines what individuals are allowed to have based on their adherence to official narratives.
The discussion explores the academic claim that "math is racist," arguing that this is an attack on objective truth. The hosts posit that hypocrisy is essentially a mathematical problem where equal actions are not given equal values. They compare the media's reaction to the summer 2020 protests versus the January 6th riot to illustrate this perceived logical inconsistency.
Political scientist John DiIulio's 1995 Weekly Standard article popularized the "super predator" term, leading to the 1994 Crime Bill. The segment critiques the use of predictive models in social science, drawing parallels between 1990s crime projections and modern COVID-19 modeling. It suggests that exaggerated data is often used to drive political narratives and legislative surges.
