57:35 You didn't chuckle. So that goes to show you people when you listen to the older shows, then you understand why that was a problem to James Amos. I mean, excuse me, John Amos. But as I said before, even me growing up, when I was growing up, the SAT was seen as a racist or biased test. And now the SAT has done things to overcome that. And the College Board will start assigning an adversity score to all students taking the SAT to capture their social and economic background. It's meant to help admissions officers account for any disadvantage stemming from those factors. The score is calculated using 15 factors including the crime rate and poverty levels from the student's neighborhood. The formula does not consider race.
58:25 Colleges will see the scores when reviewing applications. 150 institutions are expected to use this test this fall. David Coleman is the CEO of the College Board. He is here to discuss the organization's new approach and its response to the massive college admissions scandal. Good morning. Good morning. Good to see you. So you've probably seen this. One critic in The New York Times said if the SAT needed a sophisticated conventional or contextual framework to make it valid, then that's a sign that it's not a good test. So why did the College Board decide to create the adversity test? What the SAT is, is a valid measure of your achievement. What have you learned in reading and math? How ready are you for college?
59:04 But what it doesn't measure alone is it doesn't measure what you've overcome, the situation that you achieved that in. What we can do with this context data is see how resourceful you are. Have you done more with less? So to be clear, it's not really a personalized adversity score. It's the general context of your school and neighborhood. And what it's really aiming to do is highlight those resourceful students. Let me give you an example. A college that we partnered with just let in a young woman from Mississippi. She happens to be a rural white young woman in a very small school. And her SAT score was pretty much average with the other applicants, but what they found when they looked at it in context is it was 400 points higher than any other kid scored at her school. The neighborhood, the world she lived in was rife with poverty. It's a small school without a lot of advanced opportunities, but she made the most of it. So we're saying the SAT shows you achievement, but what it can't show alone
59:56 Is your resourcefulness doing more with less, you know, whenever I hear someone talking like this It sounds to me like they're just an incredible douchebag Man, oh man Jeez, so that guy could run for any political office as a Democrat right there So the adversity score so if you get a just say a 1200 and you come from a Decent background and another person comes from a poor neighborhood with high crime and they get a 1200 They're graded on a curve right how does that help? I don't understand how that helps what that does is be into the victimization mentality exactly Yes, I'm so sorry you will give you a chance
1:00:49 And yeah, the thought process is, I'm sure, lying and good intentions. But when you get to that school, they'll be like, oh, what you make on the SATs? Oh yeah, I got a 1200. And the average score there is like a 15, I don't know what the scores are now, but just say the average score is 15, 1600. What are you doing here? You don't belong. So you're creating an environment for that person to be ostracized. Instead of taking the data and saying, okay, these communities are the poor communities with high crime, let's fix the source of the problem. Oh no, no, no. We'll just take the cream of the crop. We'll just skim that off. Here we go. Come here. Yep. So that means the only people that are allowed
1:01:41 to make it out of those poor crime-ridden communities are the academic elite. Yes. Now, who's the real elitist? Who's the real, I mean, that's a bigoted mind state to say, oh, well, you couldn't make the threshold, so you're doomed to poor schools. This is the flip side of that coin of victimization mentality, the people that support this thought process. And that, oh, you said something important. Important. Is, I think that, you know, the people who are speaking about this and, you know, who put these programs in place,
1:02:26 Sadly, I think a lot of them were of good heart. They meant well, but you know what bugs me and you know I'm not I'm not gonna say it anymore is that I see this same thing happening and we have the results historical data to show that this is just not the way to do it So that's really weird. It's like you know that it's the definition of insanity Okay, let me all right, so I'm gonna give you my perspective on why I think this is deadly combination of good intentions from the good-hearted liberal people and then you have the elite of the said group. It works for them because it's like, oh yeah, help us and then we'll, you know, we'll help the people down there. Oh definitely. We just want the best. It's trickle down. Yeah, no, I totally, yeah, no, yes, I completely understand what you're saying.