Topic: Hr 40

7 chapters across the catalog

59: Restoring Justice
10:36 - 13:01

59: Restoring Justice

Reparations, Atonement, and Political Rhetoric

Mo and Adam analyze the linguistic shift from "reparations" to "atonement," citing Herschel Walker's testimony at the HR 40 hearings. They argue that "reparations" implies retribution and punishment, which alienates the public, whereas "atonement" suggests a voluntary act of making things right. They criticize media figures like Laura Ingraham for editorializing these concepts in a way that further divides political factions.

33: Sandbagged
1:00:49 - 1:04:43

33: Sandbagged

HR 40 and the Native American Comparison

Bernie Sanders eventually co-sponsored HR 40, a bill to study reparations, which the hosts view as a "dodge" to avoid committing to actual payouts. In a follow-up interview, Sanders deflects the question of Black reparations by bringing up the plight of Native Americans. The hosts criticize this "whataboutism" and note that Joe Biden was the only major candidate who did not co-sponsor the bill.

33: Sandbagged
1:18:24 - 1:22:29

33: Sandbagged

Killer Mike and the Radical Policy Debate

Rapper Killer Mike appears on CNN to support Bernie Sanders' "radical" policies, including universal healthcare and ending the school-to-prison pipeline. However, in a separate conversation with Tone Talks, the limitations of HR 40 are discussed. They argue that supporting a "study" of reparations is often a way for politicians to avoid actually implementing them.

33: Sandbagged
1:45:48 - 1:50:38

33: Sandbagged

The Political Utility of HR 40

The hosts discuss how HR 40 became a "silver bullet" for Democratic candidates to signal support for Black voters without committing to specific legislation. They credit the ADOS movement for identifying that politicians were using the bill as "political coverage." They argue that Black voters have the most leverage over Democrats and should demand "tangibles" in exchange for their votes.

19: Block the Vote
32:17 - 35:56

19: Block the Vote

Marianne Williamson and the National Reparations Debate

Marianne Williamson is credited for being the only 2020 candidate to explicitly use the word "reparations" and propose a specific figure of $400 million. The hosts discuss how mainstream media and the Democratic establishment marginalized her candidacy despite her willingness to address the issue directly. They contrast her specific proposal with the more vague "study" approach of HR 40.

01: Black Bots
0:00 - 4:01

01: Black Bots

Mo Facts Podcast Premiere, ADOS Origins

Adam Curry and Mo introduce the premiere episode of Mo Facts, explaining the show's origin following a series of direct messages and phone calls regarding the American Descendants of Slavery (ADOS) movement. Mo describes his motivation to fill information gaps left by mainstream media regarding the HR 40 reparations hearing. The discussion establishes ADOS as a specific brand for native-born Black Americans whose lineage traces back to American chattel slavery.

01: Black Bots
7:20 - 12:34

01: Black Bots

Marianne Williamson, Reparations Math and Debt

During the July 2019 Democratic primary debates, candidate Marianne Williamson argued that reparations are a debt payment for services rendered rather than financial assistance. Williamson proposed a payment of $200 billion to $500 billion, citing the historical promise of 40 acres and a mule for four million former slaves. While she acknowledges the math actually reaches into the trillions, she suggests her lower figure is more "politically feasible" for the current American climate.