17 chapters across the catalog
Moe Facts clarifies his focus on the "operating system" of white supremacy, which Neely Fuller Jr. defines as a system of injustice. He argues that anyone working toward injustice, regardless of race, is part of this system. The discussion emphasizes that the ultimate goal is justice for all people and the dismantling of mistreatment, rather than an obsession with any specific racial group.
Senator Cory Booker delivered an emotional speech during the confirmation hearings, invoking figures like Beyonce and Venus Williams to praise Judge Jackson's resilience. Adam and Mo critique the speech as "phony" and "patronizing," with Mo specifically highlighting Booker's story about a woman wanting to "touch him" because he was close to Jackson as an attempt to project a sense of divinity onto the nominee.
The Emmett Till Anti-Lynching Act is examined, with Kamala Harris and Cory Booker cited as primary proponents. The legislation defines lynching as a federal hate crime involving a mob of three or more people. The discussion links the timing of this bill to modern events like the death of George Floyd, suggesting that the administration uses the fear of historical "boogeymen" to position themselves as the necessary protectors of the Black community.
Jussie Smollett's defense team alleges the Osindaro brothers requested a $2 million bribe to retract their statements. The segment also touches on Smollett's high-profile political connections, including early support from figures like Kamala Harris and Cory Booker.
Charlamagne Tha God claimed he wanted to ask Joe Biden about reparations but was cut short by staff. Critics argue this is "bullcrap," noting that reparations should have been the first question asked during a high-visibility morning drive show if it were a true priority.
The hosts debate the ethics of excluding people who have passed as white from reparations. While one perspective views passing as a betrayal of identity, another suggests that those in positions of "white privilege" could serve as powerful allies for the ADOS movement if not alienated by strict eligibility rules.
The ADOS political group, led by Yvette Carnell, criticized Nikole Hannah-Jones for "stealing their thunder" while failing to include reparations in the 1619 Project. This is linked to Senator Cory Booker's comments about certain concepts being historically "off-limits" for discussion in the Senate.
Karen Hunter's show is analyzed for its segment on the worth of the black vote and the lack of faith in the Democratic Party. Senator Cory Booker is featured discussing the progress of reparations legislation in the Senate. The hosts compare the demand for reparations to other major "election issues" like open borders or the abolition of Roe v. Wade, characterizing it as a "big ask" requiring tangible steps.
Senator Cory Booker claims credit for sponsoring a reparations bill in the Senate, noting that these concepts were previously impossible to discuss. The hosts scrutinize Booker's phrasing about not being able to "talk about it," questioning who was preventing the Democratic Party from addressing the issue. They suggest the media and party establishment previously marginalized the topic by labeling proponents as bad actors.
The hosts discuss how HR 40 became a "silver bullet" for Democratic candidates to signal support for Black voters without committing to specific legislation. They credit the ADOS movement for identifying that politicians were using the bill as "political coverage." They argue that Black voters have the most leverage over Democrats and should demand "tangibles" in exchange for their votes.
Tariq Nasheed and the "Foundational Black American" movement are discussed as part of a broader trend of black voters vetting candidates more strictly. The hosts point to the failed campaigns of Kamala Harris and Cory Booker as evidence that the "old game" of charismatic leadership is no longer working. They credit the 2007 information age with allowing voters to see through political pandering more quickly.
The hosts open the episode by noting the suspension of Cory Booker's 2020 presidential campaign, leaving a primarily white field of candidates. They discuss the positive listener feedback from previous episodes on platforms like No Agenda Social and Twitter. The segment concludes with an explanation of the "value for value" funding model, encouraging listeners to support the show via moefundme.com or MoFacts.com.
The hosts examine the long-term effects of busing and integration on the black community, noting that pulling gifted and charismatic students out of neighborhood schools leaves the remaining students without peer inspiration. While some politicians like Kamala Harris, Condoleezza Rice, and Cory Booker are cited as success stories, the hosts argue that the policy overall resulted in a "brain drain" from black neighborhoods.
The hosts trace the origins of the podcast's commentary back to the Jussie Smollett incident and the subsequent legislative push for an anti-lynching bill by Kamala Harris and Cory Booker. They argue that Harris was the media's "chosen one" for 2020 until her campaign was derailed by debate performances and internal issues.
The discussion examines Senator Kamala Harris's early involvement in the Jussie Smollett case and her immediate labeling of the event as a "modern-day lynching." This rhetoric coincided with the Justice for Victims of Lynching Act, a bill she co-sponsored with Senator Cory Booker. Footage from an NBC panel shows Harris appearing to distance herself from her initial tweets as the facts of the Smollett case began to unravel.
Democratic presidential candidates Beto O'Rourke, Bill de Blasio, and Pete Buttigieg used nearly identical talking points at the Essence Festival, labeling black women the "backbone" of the party. Cory Booker notably deviated from the script by addressing "black voters" generally and mentioning an "agenda," which is interpreted as a break from the established campaign meme. These coordinated messages are attributed to strategists and think tanks aiming to mobilize the most loyal Democratic voting bloc.
The debate over student loan forgiveness mirrors the conversation around reparations, with both being framed as "not politically feasible" by the establishment. High levels of student debt are described as a modern form of slavery that keeps citizens beholden to the state. The hosts criticize black candidates like Cory Booker for avoiding the ADOS agenda and reparations talk in favor of safer, establishment-approved messaging.
