Topic: Black Lives Matter

Black Lives Matter issued a statement criticizing the Democratic Party for "anointing" Kamala Harris without a public primary vote. Speculation arises regarding Maryland Governor Wes Moore as a potential vice-presidential pick to create a "double black" ticket. This strategy is viewed as an attempt to shore up support among black male voters and balance the ticket's perceived gaps.

The discussion focuses on Strategy 33 regarding rational responses to terrorism, emphasizing the targeting of financial and communication bases over military force. The hosts analyze the "solidarity" seen in university protests, linking Black Lives Matter, LGBTQ movements, and pro-Palestine activism through the lens of intersectionality. They suggest Marxist organizers utilize these shared "victimhood" narratives to consolidate political power.

The hosts analyze the "end" of the primary Black Lives Matter movement, suggesting it was intentionally eclipsed by LGBTQ and trans narratives in a display of "intersectionality." They reflect on the show's beginning, where they warned that the system would eventually "come for" everyone, regardless of race, once their utility in the social engineering project was exhausted.

Strategy 31 focuses on "Destroying from Within" through infiltration. The hosts cite the Proud Boys and Black Lives Matter as groups that were compromised by internal dissension or external "money people." They reiterate that the only way to avoid this is to operate under an "Independent Code" rather than joining large, easily subverted groups.

Mo Facts draws a parallel between AI replacing human labor and the historical treatment of minority groups. The conversation shifts to a tangent about the normalization of transgenderism and gender-fluidity in Black culture, citing figures like Beyonce, Dwyane Wade's child, and characters from the television show The Wire. Mo argues that these social experiments often begin in the Black community before moving to the wider population.

Mo and Adam discuss Scott Adams' claims about reaching out to Black Lives Matter and concluding the organization was a scam. They explore the potential social costs of Adams' comments, such as being excluded from social functions and weddings. Mo introduces the concept of the "Boulay" class and how they react to threats of white flight or social isolation.

The conversation explores the strained relationship between Black and Jewish communities in America. The hosts argue that the media attempts to keep these groups aligned against West by highlighting his comments on George Floyd and his "White Lives Matter" shirt. They suggest that the lack of corporate cancellation for West's "slavery is a choice" comments, compared to his recent remarks, contributes to this tension.

The treatment of Ed Buck's victims by Democratic politicians is criticized, specifically citing Councilman Paul Koretz's alleged dismissal of the men as "disadvantaged black hustlers." This rhetoric is used to argue that the party views certain demographics as disposable once they are no longer politically useful. The hosts suggest a hypocrisy in party platforms that claim to support Black lives and LGBTQ rights while ignoring predation within their donor ranks.

The discussion focuses on how Black political leaders negotiate for "tangibles" and whose interests they truly represent in the room. There is a critique of movements like Black Lives Matter for using Black male imagery, such as George Floyd, to advance LGBTQ or other agendas that may not benefit the core constituency. The hosts argue that voters need transparency regarding a politician's priorities to know what they are "buying" with their vote.

Karen Hunter critiques "Trumpism" within the Black community, specifically targeting the ADOS (American Descendants of Slavery) movement for its "grievance mindset." She argues that this isolationist approach prevents alliances with immigrants and the LGBTQ community. The hosts counter that Black men are increasingly walking away from the "political table" because they feel their specific grievances are ignored by the progressive coalition.

A critique of modern Black radio highlights the contradiction of hosts praising "Pride Month" while simultaneously complaining about men "wearing purses." The hosts play a clip where radio personalities discuss Black men "robbing and raping" Black women, which the hosts frame as "Crime Bill 2.0" rhetoric. They point out the irony of these shows being funded by Macy's while the same media apparatus celebrated George Floyd.

A PBS "Say It Loud" segment traces the origins of Black Twitter to 2009, highlighting the community's innovative use of hashtags for storytelling and social impact. The hosts discuss how Black America has historically used self-invented means of communication, from cassette tapes to radio shout-outs, due to underrepresentation in mainstream media. They also address the concept of "cultural vulturing" where corporate entities monetize Black inventions like the turntable or specific TikTok dances.

The hosts discuss George Soros's history as a financier, specifically his role in breaking the Bank of England in 1992. They pivot to his modern influence on American local politics through the funding of "progressive" District Attorneys. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between a movement's stated goals and the institutional structures, such as "Black Lives Matter Inc.," that manage the funding.

The hosts argue that the Open Society Foundations and similar groups use their understanding of racial fear to intentionally trigger social unrest. They claim the 2020 riots were a "mercy vote" tactic designed to convince voters that the chaos would only end if Donald Trump were removed from office. The discussion critiques the use of activists as "levers" for political change, resulting in significant collateral damage to communities.

Charles Blow expresses frustration over the lack of specific mentions of Black Americans or racial justice issues in President Biden's recent speech. The hosts contrast this with Biden's 100-day speech which heavily featured George Floyd's legacy. Discussion turns to the symbolic use of Ukrainian colors in the chamber and skepticism regarding the administration's commitment to Black voters.

Voters in Columbia, South Carolina, reflect on Joe Biden's presidency two months after his election. Lawrence Nathaniel of Black Lives Matter South Carolina discusses the ongoing renovation of a church into a community center. The hosts question why the organization requires ongoing renovations despite receiving significant national donations.

The concept of immediate forgiveness for political figures is examined as a tool of social control. The hosts argue that using pastors and reverends to push political agendas destroys genuine faith. They express concern over the "religion of communism" replacing traditional church values in community centers.

The discussion addresses recent tensions involving Black Lives Matter and the Women's March regarding anti-Zionist remarks. It cites Anti-Defamation League (ADL) polls regarding anti-Semitic stereotypes in the Black community and mentions the 2019 Jersey City shooting. The segment concludes with the formation of the Bipartisan Congressional Caucus on Black-Jewish Relations by the late John Lewis.

The discussion moves to the B-block, focusing on reports that Black Lives Matter (BLM) Global Network Foundation is halting fundraising due to missing financial records. Investigative reporter Andrew Kerr details how the organization failed to disclose the whereabouts of $60 million in donations. Mo suggests the leadership is being "burned" by their corporate handlers now that their utility has expired.

The 1955 lynching of 14-year-old Emmett Till is analyzed as a political tool used to suppress the Black vote in the South. The hosts argue that Till's killers were motivated by the fear that Black majorities would change the political structure of Dixie. They draw a parallel to George Floyd, suggesting his death was "activated" by political interests to mobilize the Black vote for the 2020 election without changing underlying policies.