Topic: E News

A report from Harvard University's Hutchins Center reveals a long history of white supremacy being taught in American public education textbooks. Authors such as Ralph Waldo Emerson and Walt Whitman are cited as having used language that dismissed people of African descent. The segment explores how the royalist political model of Europe was adapted into a color-based hierarchy in the United States to maintain power.

The hosts discuss the perceived media effort to split the Republican Party by pitting Donald Trump against Ron DeSantis. Adam Curry notes that while media outlets like CNN and Fox report Trump is leading in the polls, this may be a tactic to create division. They speculate on which candidate's base would be more likely to abstain from voting if their preferred choice loses the primary.

The hosts discuss the firing of Tucker Carlson from Fox News, specifically focusing on a leaked text message regarding a video of Trump supporters attacking an "Antifa kid." They analyze Carlson's comment about "how white men fight" and suggest he was being radicalized by the very media environment he worked in. Mo Facts argues that Carlson became a threat to the elite because he adopted an "orange" mentality while possessing real power.

Fox News' programming strategy is analyzed, specifically how Tucker Carlson's anti-Big Pharma stance is "sandwiched" between pro-establishment hosts like Sean Hannity. The segment references the Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit and leaked text messages that allegedly show Fox hosts' private disdain for Donald Trump. The hosts argue that Fox uses Carlson to provide a "red pill safe space" to maintain audience ratings despite internal establishment leanings.

The hosts discuss how the term "fake news," originally coined by mainstream media, was weaponized by Donald Trump. They argue that Tucker Carlson's presence on Fox News serves as a "limited hangout" to provide credibility to an otherwise establishment network. They posit that the audience has become smarter and can now recognize when "fact-checks" are actually roundabout ways of confirming the truth.

The hosts discuss the "cognitive dissonance" of the public, using the unreliability of PCR tests as an example of how people are tricked into speaking against their own interests. They conclude that "everything is fake" and that the media creates a "simulation" of reality. They argue that the establishment hates independent conversations because they are "infectious" and encourage "freak thinking."

The episode concludes with a final round of donor thank-yous, including Jennifer Kato and Alyssa, the "apocalyptic shield maiden." The hosts briefly mention "News Benders," a 1970s BBC satirical film about planning the news years in advance. They reiterate the "value for value" mission and encourage listeners to support the show via mofundme.com as they prepare for episode 91.

A clip from the 1970s BBC film "News Benders" depicts a journalist being recruited into a secret organization that "plans the news" for the upcoming year. The dialogue suggests that hard-hitting journalism is often traded for "soufflés" (soft content) once a reporter joins the establishment. The hosts compare this fictional recruitment to the modern patterns of media manipulation and predictable news cycles.

The "News Benders" clip continues, discussing how the "full bellies" (the elite) use the threat of nuclear war and financial uncertainty to control the "empty bellies." The hosts link this to modern issues like inflation and the rise of Big Pharma products like Ozempic. They argue that the establishment "threatens people emotionally" to keep them removed from reality and dependent on corporate solutions.

The hosts link historical educational manipulation to the modern "Trusted News Initiative," a consortium of major news outlets that coordinate to approve or suppress information. They argue that this system is preparing the public for a social credit score by enforcing a "purity test" on information. They suggest the elite are making the masses weak through poor food and medical mandates while the "enlightened" are expected to stay quiet.

The hosts read donations from Associate Executive Producers and share a listener's story about the racial history of New Orleans. The listener describes learning about "octoroon" menus in historical brothels, where women were priced based on their degree of mixed-race ancestry. Moe explains the legal definitions of the "One Drop Rule," including terms like mulatto, quadroon, and octoroon, as part of a historical racial hierarchy.

A discussion on the "third rail" of media mentions how bringing up George Soros is often labeled as anti-Semitic, citing an incident on Fox News involving a Republican guest. The hosts mention Ice Cube's past attempts at independent thought and how they were similarly characterized. They argue that West used shocking rhetoric, much like Donald Trump's 2016 campaign launch, to seize the media platform.

The Sulzberger family's control of The New York Times is discussed as a form of "public service" that also grants significant social power. The hosts speculate on West's interest in Parler and Instagram's "meme-friendly" format. They note that TikTok did not ban West, suggesting the Chinese-owned platform sees a benefit in allowing his content to remain.

Rabbi Mordechai Ben Avraham, a former music producer turned rabbi living in Israel, speaks on i24 News about the lack of "Jewish diversity" presented to the world. He argues that West's comments are detrimental to Jews of color. The Rabbi emphasizes that the Jewish community includes people of Chinese, Indian, African, and Arab descent, which is often overlooked in the West.

The hosts debate why Tucker Carlson is allowed to remain on Fox News despite railing against pharmaceutical companies and the military-industrial complex. They suggest Carlson may actually want to be fired to become a "free agent." Carlson is described as a "headache" for Fox that they cannot solve because he is the only mainstream news figure that the MAGA base trusts.

Author Adam Gopnik discusses the tension between Darwin's historical vocabulary and modern scientific interpretations. The segment explores how both the creationist right and the woke left attack Darwinism for different reasons, leading evolutionary biologists to attempt to separate the man from the theory. The hosts argue that modern science is so deeply rooted in Darwin's work that "canceling" him would threaten the entire foundation of the field.

In an exclusive interview with Tamron Hall, the narrative surrounding Andrew Gillum's hotel incident is reframed as a personal struggle with depression. The segment reveals that Gillum was considered a top contender for the Vice Presidential slot, potentially rivaling Kamala Harris. The hosts speculate whether the "Coven" or party establishment orchestrated Gillum's downfall to clear the path for Harris.

Adam Curry promotes Bitcoin as the "new money" and encourages listeners to support the show through Podcasting 2.0 apps. He highlights features like searchable transcripts, chapters with images, and the ability to send "boosts" directly to the hosts.

A discussion of celebrity culture highlights how Fox News interrupted coverage of Representative Sheila Jackson Lee to broadcast the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial without commercial breaks. This shift in media focus is described as a tactic to engage audiences with riveting but irrelevant content. The hosts link this celebrity mystique to the public's fascination with figures like Elon Musk.

A viral clip from Fox News shows hosts Harris Faulkner and Melissa Francis cutting off Newt Gingrich when he mentions George Soros's role in electing "anti-police" District Attorneys. The hosts analyze this as evidence of institutional control within media networks, where certain topics are off-limits even on conservative channels. They contrast this with the "value for value" model, which allows for unrestricted discussion.